Helmholtz Tubes, CRT Signals (Was: Sigint Dumps)

[Shelley]

On June 11, 2015 7:03:14 AM Wilfred Guerin <wilfred at vt.edu> wrote:

> More specifics on the sigint system:
>
> This looks like a "Growth Industry" ...
>
> Access to the beam is not restricted, anyone can pull signals out of
> the reconaissance loop from any of its exposed vectors.***
>
> Viable areas:
> Terrestrial:
> a: Spurrious emissions from tubes or conduit, beam deflection from
> interior particles
> b: Stray beams passing through field coils but not redirected
> c: Direct access to tubes or conduit (any variety of methods)
> Orbital:
> d: Geo-Magnetic Shift (downlinks)
> e: Refractive / deflection (downlinks)
>
> As the rate of geo-magnetic shift continues to deform the containment
> of the projected fields used to shape and steer the beams (which may
> also have something to do with the sensor itself?), wider areas will
> be accessible which are hit with the rogue spot beam from orbital (and
> projected field electro-magnetic) guides.
>
> This means almost anyone with a sensor can gather data from the downlinks.
>
> Additionally, spurrious radiation from the terrestrial system is
> available around endpoints and field coils, especially from damaged
> conduit or particles in the tubes.
>
> Time to raid the libraries for antique books about 1800s-1980s X-Ray
> EM physics and electromagnetic wave guides!
>
> It would not be rational to encode the carrier signal unless it was
> certain that the encoding would not disrupt signals quality, however
> raw X-Rated signals might have been too risky?
>
> [There are Thz ring oscillators, detectors, and various photonic
> rings, but properly implemented field-effect lenses, EM field vector
> control circuitry and coils(/phased array) (abstract field
> projection), and optimal tube design are all that should
> theorhetically be needed once a rogue beam is identified. X-Ray
> Materials and interference fields must be researched and made common
> knowledge.]

>
-------> Hopefully the data source is not too easily found and the dumps get
> out, this is extremely relevant for "civil liberties", human rights,
> and reconstructing your own personal history and records where your
> data is otherwise mising.

I've been following this since it was posted.  Speaking as someone who 
doesn't trust anyone in the employ of the US of Corporatocracy: while it 
piques my interest enough to suspend my disbelief a little to see where it 
is headed, you lost me me with that last paragraph.

Without something to back it up, I just can't buy that we're living in a 
1984/Truman Show construct.  I know I'm not the only one on these lists who 
enjoys the dark utopia and Cyberpunk genres of fiction, so if you're 
testing out ideas you'll find plenty of eager readers.  But call it that, ffs.

No links to source, nothing but fantastic (albeit interesting) 
descriptions... throw us a bone, sir, or I must call BS.

-S


-—------—---------—



> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, Wilfred Guerin <wilfred at vt.edu> wrote:
> > Helmholtz Tube, Beam Steering, EM field interaction, simple field
> > dynamics, (and your oscilliscope) are all you need to create complex
> > EM signals processors.
> >
> > No different than your antique crypto cracker, which uses an abstract
> > field to solve complex pre-defined systems. "56-bit" https cracker was
> > mass implemented as a 300mhz backplane EM field solver about the size
> > of your desktop computer.
> >
> > Using the same technology, resolution, and methods, BTC Bitcoins are
> > around 8m^3 of field to solve.
> >
> > No doubt the access and decoding to these sigint signals requires
> > similar proessing before being steered to the digitiser.
> >
> > (Maxwell Tube, Helmholtz Tube, typical of high school physics classrooms)