Russia and China crack Snowden Cache

Juan juan.g71 at gmail.com
Wed Jun 17 16:20:02 PDT 2015


On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 17:33:27 -0400
Tim Beelen <tim at diffalt.com> wrote:

> So did they pass a resolution as such that I'm unaware of?


	So little Timmy is ignoring plain facts.

	Completely unsurprising.




> 
> Is there an international court that is willing to persecute?
> 
> And also because first and foremost the U.S. does not acknowledge The 
> Hague. But the EU does acknowledge US laws. Which is nice.
> 
> So, did they pass a resolution or not?
> 
> On 6/17/2015 4:49 PM, Razer wrote:
> >
> > On 06/17/2015 01:28 PM, Tim Beelen wrote:
> >> You're conflating a bunch of things.
> >>
> >> You can't have a criminal organization without crime, which require
> >> illegality, which requires laws which require a governing body. A
> >> government usually does not declare itself illegal so, no, it's not
> >> going to be a criminal enterprise.
> >>
> > Expecting criminals to adjudicate themselves as such is a little
> > beyond the pall so lets cut to the chase here,  based on one
> > criminal action for the moment. The US subscribes to the UN charter
> > and what passes for international law, which to a huge extent the
> > US had a guiding hand in shaping.
> >
> > The UN allowed the United States leeway to literally invade Iraq
> > based on evidence presented known to be lies at the time they were
> > told, by almost everyone in the US government in a position to
> > authorize policy, diplomatic OR war-related, on Iraq
> >
> > The US government and all of it's executives committed a criminal
> > act under international law by invading Iraq under false pretenses
> > and therefore IS an international criminal enterprise that
> > continues to this day in that country by our continued, and eternal
> > (at least until the oil from there and Iran runs out) presence.
> >
> 




More information about the cypherpunks mailing list