True Crypt is Not Secure
odinn
odinn.cyberguerrilla at riseup.net
Wed Jul 29 20:09:49 PDT 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have heard word of some 'openfab' project that someone has been
working on, I will inquire and will post more details if it actually
has led to something.
On 07/28/2015 03:40 PM, oshwm wrote:
> So is anyone working on building an 'openfab' or is it such a big
> task that everyone just backs away in horror? :D
>
>
> On 28 July 2015 22:04:38 BST, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> TrueCrypt has been audited[0] and come through relatively
>>> unscathed; I'd trust it over a Microsoft product I'd need to
>>> disassemble to examine any day.
>
>> You may trust your opensource code but would still need to
>> disassemble and audit any critical and closed windows libs and
>> system interfaces you compile against, let alone run in / under.
>> This is the trouble with closed platforms. You have some luck
>> with open unix, but the luck buck currently stops at the iron
>> and the hardware is getting worse. And we don't have any open
>> fabs on the horizon to solve it. This is BAD.
>
>
>
- --
http://abis.io ~
"a protocol concept to enable decentralization
and expansion of a giving economy, and a new social good"
https://keybase.io/odinn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVuZV8AAoJEGxwq/inSG8CJe4IAIoiXmWUb5dH+4w28x+qySYg
aHLUJ66gJtlEudG6B5U9ukXZGBWq2tkz1GZnAtpQAnZyjyJdZmj5k8yVpXV/S08b
IG2LzASyuf3hcEjeVMnMARKMM9PYjtVIBwMIKVviTOpK3AxM2buu7ZVaiBBOO0I1
tgL3wqAhtFwyU+R7voxoW1ObLMBXzYzggqEFKXTyY5b2rwAQylmmswIwr+wvKDm1
dHFueGYQg2uOXzsEssRPE6ByZ7h5HLtw0Tdd8k28BIMCQKc4VlctbA0kpcFKZN2p
rHojiIiwqnNEgQfAlplIAuCuYtP39fGPnOH6zeNIFPs8Xn3/eDZVdgcsavwoSMk=
=ngQq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list