Bitcoin philosophical musings and pressures 7 years in [drifted from: txrate, forking, etc]

[Lodewijk andré de la porte]

2015-07-08 9:08 GMT+09:00 Sean Lynch <seanl at literati.org>:

> A "litmus test" issue might be whether you think the NSA's expressed
> surprise over Snowden's leaks was genuine. I tend to think it was, and that
> his documents are genuine. I see no reason for the NSA to be substantially
> more competent than, say, the OPM.


There's absolutely no reason to think the NSA doesn't have a
layered/multi-cell operation wherein a mere contractor is not given access
to nation-essential secrets. If there's a foreign spy you want him to
penetrate what seems like a complete organisation. Why not give them what
they want? There's lots of "more secure than FBI/CIA, less secure than 'we
broke enigma' " work to be done, just put it in the public-facing
independently operating organisation.

Would you publish "we broke enigma" in a memo to the intranet? NSA didn't.
NSA wouldn't get worse at what they do.

The real headbreaker is when this is a problem. It's basically not a
problem until you're a threat to the absolute fundamentals of what the NSA
is designed to protect. And what's that? Is it personal freedom, the
advancement of the human race, and the minimization of suffering? Is it the
maximization of some abstract profit? The concentration of power? Do the
latter two pretty much amount to the first?

Intelligence laundering is a serious issue, of course, but running a clean
organization would make the laundering exceedingly hard.

They're each large organizations with no bottom line that attract people of
> flexible moral character who are attracted to power and/or job security.


I'm in Korea, I talked to a bunch of US soldiers stationed here. They're
exceedingly good-hearted, well-intentioned, high-spirited guys. Many love
their work, the tension, the seriousness and hone their performance for
sport and need. The balance between trigger-happy and accident-adverse is
delicate and they seem extensively coached to preserve the balance properly.

I've talked to some that like their state, but hate the FED. I've talked to
some that think the US is bad but it's enemies are worse. I've talked to
some that have doubts about parts of the US, about corruption, but believe
in democracy such that they believe the US is a fundamental force of good.

The lesson is: very moral people still do very immoral things for many,
sometimes excellent, reasons.


> I don't think those traits tend to lead to effective organizations, as
> much as a number of Hollywood movies would like us to believe.


I think there's not much difference between organisations. Make sure
people's motivations are sincere and that they put in the effort. There's
apparently a serious issue with "human resource rot" where worse people get
brought into orgs or people get unfocused or demotivated. Without a bottom
line there's less penalty for it. Doesn't mean it will happen. Snowden sure
shows a certain amount of rot in NSA_Public. The recent Trident leak shows
that the UK's nuclear deterrent program is rotten to a ridiculous point,
but seems to indicate the US does much better.

Who knows! ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3994 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150708/8cde0ad5/attachment-0002.txt>