tbiehn at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 17:02:21 PST 2015
The distinction is crypto is applied. The axioms and rules don't require
belief or faith - applied crypto has shown time and time again to require
belief and faith.
Crypto is opaque - but open.
DES was once thought to be secure.
RSA was once thought to be secure.
PKI was once thought to be secure.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <hozer at hozed.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:20:33PM -0500, dan at geer.org wrote:
> > John Young writes:
> > | Comsec dream: secure means uniquely controllable by each person.
> > | Free of faith, scripture, authorities, investors, apologists,
> > Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The
> > savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe.
> > Civilization is the process of setting man free from men.
> > -- Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead (1943)
> From each according to his ability, to each according to his need
> Does this not describe the copyleft and copyfree software? Or maybe
> it describes a world where farmers figure out they can make more
> money by giving away all the food the world needs, and knowing
> when to sell the rest for profit?
> But I have a hard time believing that mathematics is anything other
> than a testable shared belief, in which we all share faith.
Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn> | GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn>
| TravisBiehn.com <http://www.travisbiehn.com> | Google Plus
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 2371 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks