USCENTCOM Social Accounts Hacked
4chaos.onelove at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 14:20:47 PST 2015
Media I saw reported that the personnel info published was all publicly
available. Thus the intent was to create the impression that networks were
compromised. Govt line however is that the info was not confidential. I
haven't done any research however to confirm even the face validity of that.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, The Doctor <drwho at virtadpt.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> On 01/13/2015 10:46 AM, Daniel Van Wagenen wrote:
> > Does anyone else find it odd that they posted personnel data on
> > senior US military officials yet the US Government denies that any
> > military networks were compromised?
> Not at all. It is possible (maybe even likely) that whoever wrote the
> press release about it was told to omit any mention of the personnel
> data in an attempt to downplay it. People will remember what was
> talked about, not what was conveniently not talked about.
> - --
> The Doctor [412/724/301/703/415] [ZS]
> Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/
> PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
> WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/
> "You leave Jack Burton alone!" --Egg Shen, _Big Trouble In Little China_
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 2604 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the cypherpunks