[cryptography] NSA Attacks on VPN, SSL, TLS, SSH, Tor

[Cathal (Phone)]

It is of course well understood, these days, that paedophilia is exclusively the domain of white men.

On 2 January 2015 17:37:33 GMT+00:00, Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:
>that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were
>talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat
>men
>basically
>
>On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>> On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
>> > Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of
>libertarianism.
>> > I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched
>> > hardware, thx.
>>
>> No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to
>> have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand
>of
>> libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything
>that
>> let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that
>> reflects my patriarchic childhood.
>>
>> > On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100
>> >> Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting
>> >>> (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie
>porn
>> >>> sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up
>then
>> >>> you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want
>-
>> >>> perfect plan...
>> >>
>> >>     You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against
>> >>     'drugs'  and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime
>> >>     examples of statism.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>     "you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you
>> >> want"
>> >>
>> >>     Yeah, it's called freedom.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong
><demonfighter at gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet
><carimachet at gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used
>> >>>>> for
>> >>>> child porn
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the
>findings
>> >>>> correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches
>related
>> >>>> to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly
>> >>>> not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already
>> >>>> know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for
>them.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up.
>I
>> >>>> typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search
>> >>>> engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well
>> >>>> enough.)
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Cari Machet
>NYC 646-436-7795
>carimachet at gmail.com
>AIM carismachet
>Syria +963-099 277 3243
>Amman +962 077 636 9407
>Berlin +49 152 11779219
>Reykjavik +354 894 8650
>Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
>
>7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187
>
>Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
>addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not
>the
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
>information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email
>without
>permission is strictly prohibited.

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 4419 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150102/4ddfd497/attachment-0001.txt>