[cryptography] NSA Attacks on VPN, SSL, TLS, SSH, Tor

[Cari Machet]

that is a seriously narrow scope of a side topic - considering we were
talking specifically about kiddie porn watching ... by old white fat men
basically

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:

> On 01/02/2015 01:32 AM, Cathal Garvey wrote:
> > Cool, the "we should be free to rape children" brand of libertarianism.
> > I'd entirely forgotten to add you to my devnull when I switched
> > hardware, thx.
>
> No, it's the "children should be free to decide when they're ready to
> have sex, in consultation with their parents and/or guardians" brand of
> libertarianism. In my experience, young men fuck literally anything that
> let's them, while young women have far better sense. But maybe that
> reflects my patriarchic childhood.
>
> > On 01/01/15 18:26, Juan wrote:
> >> On Thu, 1 Jan 2015 18:45:48 +0100
> >> Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> good point - so, the US government is interested in supporting
> >>> (through practice) the society doing drugs and watching kiddie porn
> >>> sounds accurate to me - keep the populous stupid and fucked up then
> >>> you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you want -
> >>> perfect plan...
> >>
> >>     You seem to be missing the poing...Legislation against
> >>     'drugs'  and so called 'age of consent' 'laws' are prime
> >>     examples of statism.
> >>
> >>
> >>     "you are left to your own devices to do whatever the fuck you
> >> want"
> >>
> >>     Yeah, it's called freedom.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Steve Furlong <demonfighter at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> also seth it appears that dark web is 80 % estimated to be used
> >>>>> for
> >>>> child porn
> >>>>
> >>>> If I read the report correctly (and the report reported the findings
> >>>> correctly), the estimate was that 83% of dark web searches related
> >>>> to child porn. That's plausible, I suppose, though I'm certainly
> >>>> not taking it at face value. If I wanted to buy drugs, I already
> >>>> know the marketplaces to go to and don't need to search for them.
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyway, I just did my part to keep the kidzor pr0n searches up. I
> >>>> typed "lolita", "loli", or "loil" into a handful of onion search
> >>>> engines. (That last one was a typo, but the engine took it well
> >>>> enough.)
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet at gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 4646 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150102/2cd26fb0/attachment-0001.txt>