www.nsa-observer.net is on clear web, don't use clear web.

[coderman]

On 2/4/15, coderman <coderman at gmail.com> wrote:
>...
> don't use clear-web, not even once. not even one-way. it is DEF CON
> wireless; pre-pwned and malicious since many years.


in earlier thread, why not crowd source or lay utilize idle,
 to process archives with SIGINT and technical annotations?

consider this example, or ask your technical friend about their
complaints with shallow attention porn media which is most media.

---

in "crowd sourced" wikipedia,
  the first image is a fiction, while the program itself,
QUANTUMSQUIRREL is in fact authentic and in use recently and likely
ongoing.

this is an example of something (misunderstanding, witting or
unwitting assertion, etc.)
 that an "expert" would avoid, and not allow into reference corpus.


best regards,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Attrition_by_Tailored_Quantum_Squirrel.png
Type: image/png
Size: 379341 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150204/9df0306e/attachment-0001.png>