Pixel Dust Is Futile like FOIPA

[coderman]

On 2/5/15, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
> Peter Gutmann's pixel dust protection of privacy works as
> an update for faith in elaborately futile shenanigans to evade
> and to nab evaders inherently implanted in fetuses then re-implanted
> in corpses: dust to dust...


speaking of pixel dust futility,
  US Marshals sent back a tracking pixel nope, need vetting.
'''
We sent you a form to have you certify your identification. You have
not replied to this certification. We also ask you to clarify the
information you were seeking as you were unclear in your request. See
highlighted portion of our email below.
 << insert honeytoken >>
''''
    - https://muckrock.s3.amazonaws.com/foia_files/WRD000_630.jpg

[ or was it muckrock failing protectively? or both? or one as cover
for the latter? ... *grin* ]


---


request to DHS rejected on specificity grounds, cycle continues, ,


hey John,
 want to file FOIPAs through MuckRock
   like the fucking mad you are?
    :P