Privacy advocates resign over facial recognition plans

Cari Machet carimachet at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 19:04:41 PDT 2015


its a strange strange complex i will never understand ... its as if they
got the fight beat out of them and they just want silence out of all the
trauma they have endured - this is the solution they find
admirable\desirable ... then ask for officials to be held `
'accountable '

please beauties point me in the direction of the 'accountability office' on
fatherfucking another fucking universe vortex vacuum some weird thing in
the center of a black whole that births new stars or some crap proving once
again there is no nothing

for fuck sake peoplish movements
On Aug 12, 2015 1:39 AM, "Juan" <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:11:00 -0600
> Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
>
>
> > He was mocking you, yes. But I don't recall much from you except
> > criticism of others' ideas, plans, projects, etc.
>
>
>         Yes, exactly. Valid criticism of stuff that doesn't work and is
>         morally fucked up.
>
>         You have a problem with that? You want people to try to sell
>         garbage and go unchallenged?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > >     You, too, let me know when you guys start 'watching'  and
> > >     'holding accountable' your 'representatives'  aka your
> > > masters.
> > >
> > >
> > >     I'll be waiting for you to post the access credentials to
> > > phone companies, ISPs, datacenters and the like, so that we can
> > > start 'watching' the government just like they watch us.
> >
> > That information is out there.
>
>
>         What information is out there?
>
>         Are you missing the point on purpose? The networks are 'owned'
>         by the government and friends, and there obviously is no
>         fucking way for joe six pack to use their infrastructure to
>         'watch' his masters.
>
>
>
>
> > But it doesn't get posted on open mail
> > lists. Results are put online, via WikiLeaks, Cryptome, pastebins,
>
>         Not what I was getting at, not to mention, the amount of stuff
>         that gets posted is (pretty) small.
>
>
> > etc. But once access info goes public, it becomes useless.
>
>
>         Of course. Like I said, the networks are owned by the
>         government. Temporary glitches in security don't mean much, if
>         anything.
>
>         Oh, and let me know when the nsa really gets 'hacked'  as
>         opposed as having one employee betray them.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3154 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150812/be50b28f/attachment-0002.txt>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list