POTUS jammin'

[Juan]

On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 16:59:50 -0800
coderman <coderman at gmail.com> wrote:


> > If that were the case, then a shielded, passive receiver ought to
> > be OK,
> 
> a shielded, passive receiver would be overwhelmed by the brute flood.
> 
> 

	Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't a shielded receiver be a
	useless receiver? 

	If you shield a receiver from a jamming signal, you are also
	shielding it from the signal you want to receive? What am I
	missing?