POTUS jammin'

[Cathal (Phone)]

Yea, I was referring to emissions shielding, so that when in "receive" mode there is little or no signal output from the device that can indicate its presence to a targeted jammer.

On 30 November 2014 07:30:49 GMT+00:00, coderman <coderman at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 11/29/14, Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> 	Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't a shielded receiver be a
>> 	useless receiver?
>
>not a bad question;
> you don't appreciate variable attenuation until you've used it
>effectively to locate an emitter or test specific boundary conditions.
>
>also note that shielding may be partial to eliminate or deflect
>emissions from a given direction.
>
>best regards,

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1204 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20141130/cac5668d/attachment-0001.txt>