is truecrypt dead?

[Cathal (phone)]

I recall hearing of exactly that occurring, yes. The secret police can not only force you not to speak, but to publicly declare everything is fine.

On 30 May 2014 14:44:32 GMT+01:00, Lance Cottrell <loki at obscura.com> wrote:
>On May 30, 2014, at 4:56 AM, dan at geer.org wrote:
>
>> 
>> | 
>> | Could this non-notice be a Lavabit/Silent Circle type
>announcement/warning?
>> | 
>> 
>> We need, somehow, a safe word for such projects.  Presumably one
>> that is triggered by a failed keep-alive.  This has been discussed
>> before variously, but it may be an idea whose time has come.  Design
>> will require choices between false alarms and silent failure.
>> 
>> --dan
>> 
>
>A deadman switch for NSL alerts would make for an interesting case.
>Would a judge rule that you had “spoken” about the NSL by failing to
>send the keep-alive messages, thus compelling you to continuously speak
>the lie that you have not received one?
>
>--
>Lance Cottrell
>loki at obscura.com

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1514 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140530/8beb370a/attachment-0001.txt>