is truecrypt dead?

[Cari Machet]

looks a little too russian in the last entry to pass as true

http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xE3BA73CAF0D6B1E0




On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 28 May 2014 19:45:06 -0400
> Griffin Boyce <griffin at cryptolab.net> wrote:
>
> >    My suspicion is that either they were hacked (and had their key
> > stolen), or that they were ordered to shutdown and recommend
> > Microsoft's (presumably backdoored) BitLocker as a replacement.
>
>
>         truecrypt.org redirects to this
>         http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/
>
>         Pretty crazy. Whoever the developers may be, after spending a
>         good deal of effort on their project, now are licking MS'
>         boots? It doesn't make sense.
>
>
>
>
> > BitLocker's enterprise documentation makes me *incredibly* suspicious
> > that it is susceptible to monitoring by third-parties.
> >
> >    Even being embarrassed by whatever bugs the second phase audit
> > uncovered wouldn't explain the sudden recommendation. And why not
> > ecryptfs or ~literally anything else~ ?
> >
> >    Pardon my tinfoil hat.
> >
> > ~Griffin
>
>


-- 
Cari Machet
NYC 646-436-7795
carimachet at gmail.com
AIM carismachet
Syria +963-099 277 3243
Amman +962 077 636 9407
Berlin +49 152 11779219
Reykjavik +354 894 8650
Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>

7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187

Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
permission is strictly prohibited.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 2766 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140529/8d0c9171/attachment-0001.txt>