MH370 in hangar at Diego Garcia, detainees already rendered

[Juan Garofalo]

--On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 12:09 AM +0000 Cathal Garvey
<cathalgarvey at cathalgarvey.me> wrote:

> One account I read held that telemetry is initially disabled, then
> re-enabled sequentially while the cause is narrowed down. But that the
> priorities are so urgent (you have about 3 minutes to live) that
> actually using the communications equipment is not an option; the pilot
> must immediately land while trying to narrow the problem, full-stop.
> 
> The scenario plays out in other cases that didn't go well that the crew
> ultimately succumb to smoke/monoxide inhalation and simply pass out,
> leaving the plane continuing on autopilot, *and pinging quietly*, until
> it ditches.


	So the fire was big enough to poison the biological systems aboard
 the plane, but not big enough to cause any substantial damage to the
mechanical systems - I guess that's a possibility. 

	For what it's worth, I don't subscribe to any particular theory, and I'm
not inclined to believe in terrists either. (Well, except for the big
terrorist organizations known as 'governments')

	



> 
> That was the scenario I read, at least. All the other scenarios seem
> equally unlikely in the first place, but also unlikely to be so clean
> and tidy. Hackers hack the instruments? Great! How many flight-school
> trained hackers can successfully pilot a plane from the in-flight
> entertainment system? In fact, how many hackers of that calibre,
> full-stop, have any experience flying planes? That's your suspect group.
> Where are they, then?
> 
> Government or state-sponsored hijackers? Then why such a confusing job?
> Why so silent yet also suspicious? And why instantly turn to the nearest
> airport, whereas hijackers would take a more circuitous route?
> 
> Want to just crash a plane because you're a fairy-tale terrorist? Then
> why the silence, and no terror-inspiring speeches claiming credit, and
> why disable radio communications on the plane? You want terror, right
> mister stereotyped extremely-unlikely-person?
> 
> To me this has all the hallmarks of an unfortunate accident, and after
> reading the pilots' fire explanations, both of which referenced
> real-world examples, I'm pretty happy to agree with the experts in
> aviation over the Intel wonks looking for Cyber Pearl Harbour or the
> media fools looking for an amazing scoop.
> 
> On 18/03/14 22:27, Juan Garofalo wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> --On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 3:21 PM +0000 Cathal Garvey
>> <cathalgarvey at cathalgarvey.me> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> That all the Pilots are saying "Probably Fire" and nobody's listening,
>>> in favour of all sorts of bizarre and unlikely conspiracies, says a lot
>>> about our maturity and our level of openness to fearmongering.
>> 
>> 
>> 	Is the 'probably fire' theory compatible with this? 
>> 
>> 	http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2014/03/16/mh370-x-factors-cont
>> 	inue-to-baffle-airline-insiders/
>> 
>> 
>> 	" there were regular stand-by pings from the airliner's otherwise
>> 	disabled ACARS automated performance update system, between 1.07 am KL
>> time on 8 March when that system stopped filing data, and that last
>> known ping at 8.11 the same morning"
>> 
>> 
>> 	http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527023041851045794375733965803
>> 	50.html
>> 
>> 	"The automatic pings, or attempts to link up with satellites operated by
>> Inmarsat PLC, occurred a number of times after Flight 370's last verified
>> position, the people briefed on the situation said, indicating that at
>> least through those five hours, the Boeing Co. BA -1.10% 777 carrying 239
>> people remained intact and hadn't been destroyed in a crash, act of
>> sabotage or explosion."
>> 
>> 
>> 	etc? 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 18/03/14 14:45, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Anonymous Remailer (austria)
>>>> <mixmaster at remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Diego Garcia
>>>> 
>>>> Fuck tinfoil.
>>>> 
>>>> Cypherpunks use graphene.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> RAH
>>>> ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> Curiouser and curiouser, innit?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA
>>> P: +3538763663185
>>> W: http://indiebiotech.com
>>>  
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA
> P: +3538763663185
> W: http://indiebiotech.com
>