Gox dox'ed
Juan Garofalo
juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 9 20:04:08 PDT 2014
--On Sunday, March 09, 2014 7:33 PM -0700 coderman <coderman at gmail.com>
wrote:
> it seems the answer is here:
lol!
(See how evil top posting is? =P - It took me a couple of minutes to
figure out that my question was finally being answered =) )
>
> http://blog.magicaltux.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/MtGox2014Leak.zip
> http://89.248.171.30/MtGox2014Leak.zip
> https://mega.co.nz/#!0VliDQBA!4Ontdi2MsLD4J5dV1-sr7pAgEYTSMi8rNeEMBikEhAs
> http://burnbit.com/download/280433/MtGox2014Leak_zip
>
>
> let me know if you're still short a mirror...
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Juan Garofalo <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:12 PM -0600 Troy Benjegerdes
>> <hozer at hozed.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'd argue that centralized systems provide, on averge, a larger
>>> anonymity set and privacy in the majority of cases than decentralized
>>> ones. In particular exchanges that everyone believes are 'incompetent'
>>> are a wonderful place to get a lot of cheap plausible deniability by
>>> making everyone else that uses it pay for it when the house of cards
>>> falls down.
>>
>>
>> In the case of something like mtgox, how did it provide privacy?
>> Or plausible deniality? Users have to send IDs, bank account
>> details, everything is logged, etc etc. What am I missing?
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -- --- Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer'
>>> hozer at hozed.org 7 elements
>>> earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.coop
>>>
>>> Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
>>> nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list