Gox dox'ed

Juan Garofalo juan.g71 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 9 20:04:08 PDT 2014



--On Sunday, March 09, 2014 7:33 PM -0700 coderman <coderman at gmail.com>
wrote:

> it seems the answer is here:


	lol! 

	(See how evil top posting is? =P -  It took me a couple of minutes to
figure out that my question was finally being answered =) )


> 
> http://blog.magicaltux.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/MtGox2014Leak.zip
> http://89.248.171.30/MtGox2014Leak.zip
> https://mega.co.nz/#!0VliDQBA!4Ontdi2MsLD4J5dV1-sr7pAgEYTSMi8rNeEMBikEhAs
> http://burnbit.com/download/280433/MtGox2014Leak_zip
> 
> 
> let me know if you're still short a mirror...
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Juan Garofalo <juan.g71 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> --On Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:12 PM -0600 Troy Benjegerdes
>> <hozer at hozed.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> I'd argue that centralized systems provide, on averge, a larger
>>> anonymity set and privacy in the majority of cases than decentralized
>>> ones. In particular exchanges that everyone believes are 'incompetent'
>>> are a wonderful place to get a lot of cheap plausible deniability by
>>> making everyone else that uses  it pay for it when the house of cards
>>> falls down.
>> 
>> 
>>         In the case of something like mtgox, how did it provide privacy?
>>         Or plausible deniality? Users have to send IDs, bank account
>> details, everything is logged, etc etc. What am I missing?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -- --- Troy Benjegerdes                 'da hozer'
>>> hozer at hozed.org 7 elements
>>> earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul        grid.coop
>>> 
>>>       Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,
>>>          nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>  





More information about the cypherpunks mailing list