PBS Frontline and "The Program"'s "innovative" legal interpretations [was: stinky shit in fedland - lawful^H^H^Hless mobile fuckery cover-ups in progress...]

[coderman]

regarding the parallel construction and warantless / indiscriminate techniques,

the PBS Frontline program "United States of Secrets" provides an
exceptional analysis of how these invasive and un-constitutional
programs and arguments came into being and expanded across
administrations.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/united-states-of-secrets/ or
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/united-states-of-secrets/transcript-61/

# convenient links, for those who can't torrent / stream
https://peertech.org/files/PBS.Frontline.2014.United.States.of.Secrets.1.mp4
https://peertech.org/files/PBS.Frontline.2014.United.States.of.Secrets.2.mp4

# plaintext for those with poor clients who can't speak strong SSL/TLS
http://207.198.103.187:8081/PBS.Frontline.2014.United.States.of.Secrets.1.mp4
http://207.198.103.187:8081/PBS.Frontline.2014.United.States.of.Secrets.2.mp4


best regards,


On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:12 PM, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> - Truly In-discriminant and Whole-sale Invasions of Constitutionally
> Protected Communications Are Routine Fed Behaviors
> and not just routine but the expected side effects of military
> blunt-force intelligence gathering systems aimed at domestic targets
> illegally. these military systems covertly re-purposed for domestic
> surveillance at the federal level enjoy FBI DITU running front-man and
> cover for all the exceptional secrecy this programs entails. (and why
> such truly aggressive offensive techniques applied indiscriminately
> have yet to reach state and municipal LE need to know.)