Tox.im

rysiek rysiek at hackerspace.pl
Mon Jul 7 07:55:37 PDT 2014


Dnia poniedziałek, 7 lipca 2014 16:06:47 Dāvis Mosāns pisze:
> I don't agree, I think XMPP could be good solution, while yes attack
> surface is quite large but it will be in any case, because even if you
> create the very minimalist chat protocol possible (let's say basically use
> asymmetric cryptography for messages which are plaintext without any
> features) you still can have bugs in cryptography library, network stack,
> OS/kernel. This part will be same no matter what messaging protocol you
> use.

Exactly. And that's an argument for NOT minimizing the attack surface beyond 
these problems... how exactly?

I mean, your argument is basically: "don't wash your hands, as there might be 
salmonella in the eggs anyway". Dafuq?

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140707/4e0d7a68/attachment-0002.sig>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list