{}coin: good enough for election politics?

Ted Smith tedks at riseup.net
Fri Jan 24 11:27:44 PST 2014


On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 01:37 -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, James A. Donald wrote:
> 
> > On 2014-01-24 01:55, Ted Smith wrote:
> > > That also rather obviously had nothing to do with "the state" and far
> > > more to do with the massively bad PR that comes from employing openly
> > > misogynist assholes.
> > 
> > Anil was the state.  Anil was not the public.  The public quietly approves of
> > what Pax said, though it is terrified to say so in public.
> 
> None of us can presume to 'know what the public thinks'.

But James does. And he's going to continue insisting on presuming to.

Is this conversation really helpful for the cypherpunks list?

Is it signal or noise?

Please, just killfile James already and move on with your life. There's
no need to keep feeding that troll.

I'm sorry if once, he was a productive list member. It's too late now,
Jim. We have to accept it.

-- 
Sent from Ubuntu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140124/5808c2ea/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the cypherpunks mailing list