Swartz, Weev & radical libertarian lexicon (Re: Jacob Appelbaum in Germany - Aaron Swartz)

[Juan Garofalo]

--On Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:09 AM +0100 Cari Machet
<carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:

> the notion that an idea of private property as all encompassing is
> banal > there are no absolutes


	Let's say I grow my own food. Do you think I'm the onwer of the food I
grow? Or maybe some people, let's call them the 'government', have a
'right' to my food? 

	If I'm not the 'absolute' owner of my person and what I produce, who is
it? 





> but to parse it for you believing in
> something is about religion which is smoke and mirrors + the public
> sphere is waning if you havent noticed 


	Not sure what you mean by the public sphere, but what I understand by the
public sphere isn't exactly waning.

	

> but its not so much an
> emergency but an emergence of the collective ... an opportunity > your
> choice to be mindful of the reality or not
> 
> klein is an economist

	yeah well, so were keynes and marx. Or at least there are people who think
they were 'economists'...



> 
> On 1/9/14, Juan Garofalo <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> --On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 11:11 PM +0100 Cari Machet
>> <carimachet at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> to all the libratarians on the planet that 'believe' in ownership
>> 
>> 	In case you're addressing me... =P
>> 
>> 	(well, you seem to be talking to James, but replied to a post of mine,
>> 	so I'm not sure)
>> 
>> 	
>>> 
>>> 'belief' and 'ownership' are idiotic arcane notions of anthropocentric
>>> type amygdala activity
>>> 
>>> https://archive.org/details/The_Shock_Doctrine.The_Rise_of_Disaster_Cap
>>> it alism
>> 
>> 
>> 	Is Klein some kind of radical anarcho communist? If not she probably
>> subscribes to some notion of private property...
>> 
>> 	
>>> 
>>> this means you james > with a caveat that obama is a disgusting
>>> reflection of the system and ppl were ill informed to think he wasnt >
>>> i offer this piece by naomi klein in dispute of your 'ideology' seen
>>> thru your crummy/flimmsy/pathetic analysis of aaron's work
>>> 
>>> if you have seen it then you have no excuse for your mindset > if you
>>> have not seen it i dare you to debate its consciousness
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1/8/14, Juan Garofalo <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 6:59 AM -0500 Ulex Europae
>>>> <europus at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> At 02:07 AM 1/8/2014, Juan Garofalo wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>         fucking americunt fascist.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Russian emigre. Yes there is a difference, and yes that is relevant.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 	As a transplanted nationalist, she was even more rabid than home grown
>>>> nationalists. That's the first(and only) difference that comes to
>>>> mind...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --ue
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cari Machet
>>> NYC 646-436-7795
>>> carimachet at gmail.com
>>> AIM carismachet
>>> Syria +963-099 277 3243
>>> Amman +962 077 636 9407
>>> Berlin +49 152 11779219
>>> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
>>> 
>>> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
>>> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not
>>> the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
>>> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email
>>> without
>>> permission is strictly prohibited.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cari Machet
> NYC 646-436-7795
> carimachet at gmail.com
> AIM carismachet
> Syria +963-099 277 3243
> Amman +962 077 636 9407
> Berlin +49 152 11779219
> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
> 
> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
> permission is strictly prohibited.
>