Swartz, Weev & radical libertarian lexicon (Re: Jacob Appelbaum in Germany - Aaron Swartz)

[Juan Garofalo]

--On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:14 PM +1000 "James A. Donald"
<jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:

> "James A. Donald"
>> > No one gave a damn about Aaron Swartz leaking the docs.  That was not
>> > what he was charged with, and not what pissed off the sysadmins.  What
>> > pissed off the sysadmins was physical intrusion, and him bringing the
>> > network to its knees.
> 
> On 2014-01-08 11:32, Juan Garofalo wrote:
>> 	That is bullshit.
> 
> That is the charges against Aaron Swartz.
> http://docs.jstor.org/summary.html


	That's a link to jstor. Irrelevant. 


> 
>> If you want to attack Swartz you can do it without laughably trying to
>> defend the 'physical property' of the mit mafia. Your defense being
>> doubly weird since you're supposedly a libertarian?
> 
> Libertarians are propertarians.

	Only when 'private property' is subordinated to FREEDOM. 

	> 
> Property rights are the boundaries between one man's plan and another
> man's plan.  If the ruling elite casually violate property rights, then,
> as with Obamacare, the result is chaos,

	You're just a right winger, not a libertarian. Right wingers are always
babbling about how bad democrats are while commiting the same crimes. 

	

> which must be resolved by one
> plan imposed on all to restore order in order to avoid collapse. Terror
> follows in due course.  Should the terror ease, collapse follows.
> 
> This has been explained by Mises and Hayek,

	fucking conservative statists - and lapdogs of anglo-american fascism.


	
> and colorfully dramatized by
> Ayn Rand.


	fucking americunt fascist. 



> 
> 
>