Lavabit

[Scott Blaydes]

Now that is something I would help crowd fund, the paying of the dude’s contempt of court fines. Who cares about kickstarting some groups game, or help bring a cellphone activated door lock to market. I would rather kick some cash to the guy who did as much as he could to keep his clients data “safe”, even when threatened by three letter agencies. Thats some balls in my book.

Thank you,
Scott Blaydes

On Apr 17, 2014, at 3:48 PM, dan at geer.org wrote:

> 
> http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/news/lavabit-snowden-appeal-lost-144112
> 
> Lavabit Loses Contempt Of Court Appeal
> 
> Failure to hand over encryption keys could land Lavabit founder Levison
> with hefty fines
> On April 17, 2014 by Thomas Brewster
> 
> Lavabit, the email service once used by whistleblower Edward
> Snowden, has lost an appeal against a contempt of court ruling
> that he delayed the US Government's attempts to gather information
> by refusing to hand over encryption keys.  the email service,
> which has since closed, was eventually forced to comply anyway.
> 
> The US government asked for SSL keys to look at the metadata
> (dates and other details of communications) for a specific Lavabit
> user, believed to be Snowden, The service's founder Ladar Levison
> at first refused, and when forced to comply, provided the keys
> printed in a tiny typeface.
> 
> The court ruled that Lavabit had not followed correct procedures
> in its initial hearings, and had not raised a specific challenge
> to the district court's authority under the so-called "pen/trap
> statute".  Levinson could now be fined for contempt.
> 
> "Levison's statement to the district court simply reflected his
> personal angst over complying with the pen/trap order, not his
> present appellate argument that questions whether the district
> court possessed the authority to act at all," read a statement
> from the fourth US circuit court of appeals Judge G Steven Agee.
> 
> "Arguments raised in a trial court must be specific and in line
> with those raised on appeal."
> 
> The case stems back to June last year, when the US government
> sought to acquire private keys for SSL encrypted traffic of a
> specific Lavabit user, thought to be Snowden. Officials sought
> to put a tap on the communications of that target to collect
> metadata.
> 
> Levison, when approached by FBI officials, refused to hand over
> the keys, which eventually led to the contempt of court charge.
> 
> According to the court filing denying his appeal, Levison suggested
> he could provide the content the government was after, rather
> than using their interception tools. The government decline the
> offer, saying it needed real-time acquisition of the target's
> data.
> 
> A device to intercept traffic was installed as part of the
> pen/trap order, but could not gather usable information as the
> encryption keys had not been provided.
> 
> Officials did eventually get the keys in August 2013, however.
> "The government sought penalties of $5,000 a day until Lavabit
> provided the encryption keys to the government. The district
> court granted the motion for sanctions that day. Two days later,
> Levison provided the keys to the government. By that time, six
> weeks of data regarding the target had been lost," the court
> ruling read.
> 
> Levison could now be fined thousands of dollars.
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140418/fceb831b/attachment-0001.sig>