[3] sampling continued

[brian carroll]

// apologies- yet another attempt at error correction of a previous
statement and clarification.

quote: Subvert logical reasoning, disallow it, including freedom of speech
and thinking and censoring and controlling what facts are allowed -
controlling POV - then the opposite occurs:  A|B ---> B, such that  T => pT

This is the code exploit of the Binary Crypto Regime, where B(0)=A and
pT(0)>T(1)


--- clarification on computational approach ---

I made an error in description of processing in the context of infinities,
stating one infinity to the next is evaluated as if a serial approach when
instead this would be nonlinear and require massively parallel processing,
along with serial evaluations in a looping evaluative heuristic - testing
against a hypothesis or model, 'running code' or living code' as it were,
versus a static one-time interaction of data and algorithms, instead more
like a situation of intelligent life in a bounded context as if data
aquarium or code planetarium.

the reason for this parallelization relates to considering all the combined
permutations in terms of probabilities, and thus [x][y][z] as variables are
not necessarily, seemingly, about an algorithm that reveals a structure
that helps move from x->y->z by some mathematical structure, or so that is
my naive guess, such that if you use conventional crypto approach #1
something may be revealed between these that matches an equation pattern,
provides order within the chaos of variability, until legible,
intelligible.*

In other words, instead of XYZ being a serial number that could extend
linearly onward toward infinity, that is: [xyz] ...[∞], and that "string"
is a horizontal number or code, that can in particular be related perhaps
to binary on-off processing in a highly efficient manner, processing and
computational speed and largest prime numbers as context-- instead, the
assumption for this same situation in another crypto framework is that it
could be happening 'vertically' like a slot machine that runs to bounded
infinities (largest primes or not), within each variable, and thus [xyz]
may not have a discernible linear structure or overall equation that makes
sense of the resulting 'horizontal' string. such that:

   [x][y][z] => [n¹][n²][n³]...[nⁿ]

whereby [n] is variable and could be anything- a number, a function, a
calculation, null, its own computation. And in this way, each variable
could tend towards infinity or its own structuring, within the string,
whose length is not so much the issue as the difficulty in resolving its
total structure, especially linearly, such that [n¹²³] would not be
decipherable running algorithms across its horizontal string and instead
solving for each variable or say grouped variables in the string, eg.
[n¹][n²⁻³][n⁴⁻⁹]

Thus, while i have no actual idea of how crypto and binary code relate in
terms of encryption methods and decryption, it is assumed this approach
remains serial and directly interrogates the serial string to reveal its
structure, across various formats of the code (various programming,
encoding and other data formatting schemes). Thus, a binary string would be
an example, 10100011001010001010101010010101, whereby to solve for
[xyz...n] would involve finding the overall linear structure that provides
for such linear organization, say assuming it is encrypted code
*)S)*S*))SA&*S&**S()S*S)aAUIHNL*0, and therefore the assumption would
remain that each variable is related to the next in some 'coherence' and
solving one part or layer may reveal another, such as
HSKSLLILHSILALSWLWLSDUI and thus the string [xyz] is made intelligible by
this coherence within the linear string, across that massive horizontality
(very large streams of data that contain data and programs and messaging).

Whereas for a paradoxical logic approach, each variable could itself be
'many' in place of a single bit- or the boundary of the single bit could be
[N] and move towards a bounded infinity, a mathematical function, or other
calculation in that same location.

disclaimer, stating the obvious, i have no idea what this is in terms of
applied cryptography, there is tremendous gap between these statements and
actual code, though to me the approach is much more accurate as "thinking
code" that involves human processing via logical reasoning, parallel and
serial processing, and thus the very idea of a string of code in that view
could also function as signal in noise or even absolute truth, in terms of
messaging. and so it is obvious 'binary thinking' is not like everyday
evaluation in the sense that there is grey-area to mediating events, a
pause to decision- yet within this pause, bounded infinities of hypotheses
can be queried (referencing previous instances in stored or external
memories) that then influence the tallying of the response, which most
likely will be weighted between 1 and 0, unless purely ideological.

Thus- *conceptually*- to consider "code" in this human context, of a living
breathing idea that is grounded in empirical truth in a shared human
viewpoint, that is to be shared as information, via exchange, it is more
grayscale than 10110101010100001, in terms of language and how thinking
functions, more about looping and weighting of variables than having a
*single correct result* when there can be several overlapping or
contrasting interpretations *at the same time*. So imagine if the binary
string had each bit that was variable instead in a 0-9 scale of weighting
the evaluation, such that 10927238292340246.

This moves the [binary] string into a fragmented string of variables, more
like analog computation [1][0][9]...[6]. In this way it is to consider the
'bit' as N-variable, and thus what if it were the alphabet instead of
numbers: 26 letters possible for each bit: USOWHLSELNSQAHBVY

the issue being that like a slot machine, those [N] variable bits could
tally up any potential letter of 26, or +10 numbers with alphanumerics, or
add lower case and punctuation or symbols and suddenly a small 'string' of
data could involve huge interrelational structures that may or may not be
related across the horizontal span, depending on how it is constructed via
algorithms and conceptual formatting. Maybe this already is the way
transformed code is achieved with taking a certain sized content- variable
[x], and then transmuting its entirety into a string or stream of
obfuscated data that must be 'worked at' to decrypt or be translated to
make use of.

The seeming difference would be computationally, how this relation exists
in processing, in terms of hardware and software, though also thinking,
programming. Because what if there is a limit to these transmutations that
is forced into a binary 1/0 and thus bounds these infinities to only
certain algorithmic space, or even computationally, that such numbers
cannot be adequately computed and thus *do not exist* as calculations
within machines and software approaches, crypto perhaps especially, when
the security they would provide would be unfathomable in terms of existing
brute force calculations of 'linear' patterns.

my speculation is of an unknowing of applied cryptography and computer
programming yet knowing of logical reasoning and empirical thinking,
awareness, and how the two are ideologically at odds in approach in terms
of basic assumptions. thus within my condition of 'illiteracy' there is an
attempt to share an idea (pT) about a shared situation from an outsider
vantage, with those of highest literacy of applied code, yet within what to
my observation is a flawed idea and based on false and inaccurate
assumptions, in particular the primacy of binarism for security when this
nonlinear/multilinear computation (parallel & serial) would easily defeat
it.

such that it is not about strings and instead parallel sets: [x|x|x|x]...[n]

as the [variable] yet this may not be coherent in a horizontal algorithm to
solve, it may not have 'rationality' across, from one digit to the next,
revealing its hidden structure. instead, randomness would be inherent
instead of woven into the code, it would be more revealing information out
of noise structures than putting information into noise that is bounded and
can be shaped into structure. in this way also, noise could have structure
yet not lead to decryption, it may be a false corridor within the ever
expanding maze.

it is that [N] variables each are in superposition, not static by default,
finite and absolute, and instead 'truly variable', unbounded to a certain
extent (infinities within infinities across infinities via nested sets).

the conceit or test of the heresy would be 256 'bit' quantum computer that
solves 256 AES, though if it were a binary string this could even be
trivial, versus say [N]-bit, which seemingly could take *forever* to
evaluate, via running, looping code evaluation and a shared empirical model
that develops alongside, out of and through the technology as a 'thinking
machine'-- which, the more it is like the human brain, the more likely the
messaging could be made sensible via existing concepts and structures to
test against, evaluating patterns and looking for correlations. in that
context, a three bit [N]-variable string of code could probably defeat all
computing power today, especially if large expanses were allowed, numbers,
letters, symbols-- it would be unsolvable potentially, extremely probable.
Largest primes would be a minor detail, another variable seemingly in such
a context, due to its potential for incoherence and complexity.

likewise, this [N]-bit approach for random number generators, yet why not
random outside of 1/0 as a noise field, generating strings via a two
[N]-variable string, just let it run and tap that, without or without
structure, would it even matter. in other words: take any two ideas, any
two signs or symbols or colors or whatever, and relate them and tally and
extend this as a process. that is proto-language in a nutshell, this the
crazy nut cracked open yet beyond the insanity of my own incapacity to
communicate and flaws in understanding-- there is something about this
approach and basically observation that has *coherence* that is absent in a
binary approach and serial algorithms-- because that is not how people
think or communicate, it is N-dimensional, geometrical, looping. and
processors and code and software at present cannot model this, allow for
it. and that formats reasoning, perception, what options are available to
share ideas and evaluate them, and we are stuck in binary because it is
enshrined both in technology though also in institutions-- it is the dead
static code of shared ideological non-thinking that is pushing
decision-making and actions towards its deterministic end game, which is a
onesided machine-based value system, devoid of life, nature, and humanity,
except insofar as it profits its own continuing automated development and
further extension.

so the gap between my illiterate views and the actuality of implemented
security code by those literate is one aspect, though another is my
literacy in thinking code and the illiteracy of thinking within
foundational technology, its infrastructure, and the result of this, which
requires a world like it is, and relies on bad code and ideas to allow for
it. thus an audit or accounting of the situation, an attempt to get across
the idea that there is a model of dumb, unintelligent code at the base of
this situation, the approach is so flawed as to be the basis for tyranny,
and it ties into 'ideology' across platforms, individuals and groups of
people to software/hardware and bureaucratic systems, and in that 'combined
state' of a false-perspective empire, the kernel is corrupt and the whole
thing invalid, including at the constitutional level which itself is
ignored, by binary default, the epic loophole of relativistic frameworks
allowing the fiction and its virtuality to replace shared logical
reasoning, because truth and logic can simply be ignored, 'privatized'. and
enclaves can rule over others as if a caste-system via technology and
ideological assumptions that function as religion, technologists as
priests, gods of this technocratic utopia, the peasants not having the
understanding to operate in such a realm, as guaranteed by the originating
lie and tradeoff that allows for all of this to continue. that absolute
truth is an everyday condition and you get to choose what to believe as if
a right or protected mode of operation, no matter how many others must
suffer for it, to sustain the illusion and shared delusion.

the cloud here in the corrupted model a state filing cabinet, digital
bureau for the bureaucracy, citizens organizing info into others invisible
folder structures, volunteering the data via handover, designed into the
technology itself as a marketing and communications strategy. the sieve of
private data is equivalent to entire populations seeking out pickpockets to
hand over their contents, incentivized as it is. and so 'security' is as if
a kind of institutional transparency in relation to a corrupted, failed,
rogue state that can read and see everything you are doing, whether or not
encrypted, dumb terminals every computer to the state mainframe, rebranded
and rebadged, hidden, 'anonymous'.

--- more of this insane ungrounded viewpoint --

it was mentioned a three variable 'string' [x|y|z] would be differently
approached if parallel versus serial, in that each bit of a binary string
could be N-variable in a parallel approach, or so it is assumed possible,
as with probabilities and slot machines, or basic everyday observation of
events and what enters and exits consciousness given context. and while not
knowing the depth of this in terms of cryptography, completely out of my
depth, it would seem the concept of keyspace could relate to how such a
'paradoxical string' could exist, given the boundary for determining what N
could be for [x], [y], [z].  For instance if it were binary ones and
zeroes, the probabilities could be run and 8 different permutations or
combinations: 111, 100, 110, 101, 010, 011, 001, 000.

And within that, perhaps there is meaning. Yet if 'the probabilities' are
changed via [N]-bit variables, it could go all the way to infinity for a
single variable, and thus BIG BANG inflate via probabilities into a huge
keyspace, perhaps unpacking structures this way that reference others
already developed, as if infrastructure being revealed that connects with
others elsewhere, via wormhole-like connectivity and then closing down upon
successful messaging, thus encrypting and decrypting via few variables, via
inherent yet hidden structural relations within these combinations, which
could be infinities related to infinities and then the issue of how to find
them or what to look for. Black box yet even moreso, RNG as model for
signal, not noise, thus tending toward psychic Random Event Generator as if
innate sense of animals before catastrophe, cosmic faults and folds.

the idea or difference is paradox- essentially *superposition* of the bit
as [N]-variable, no longer finite and static, potentially active and
transformative, diagnostic even in a sensor sense of the analogue as queued
circuit. What if alignment occurs in the string under certain conditions
and not others, what if it tunes in and structures revealed, decrypt, yet
out of tune it vanishes, code collapse or changes as with temperature
sensing colors, and the variables change, mask into background, returning
to mystery. It does not seem that computers today can even adequately allow
for infinity, a single bit of this, versus a larger parallel string- and
what might that mean about thinking, too. nothing more than finite discreet
thoughts, one decision to the next unconnected, unless largest prime, say
rogue US terror-state pwns earth as if master discourse, shared POV, even
though ungrounded- this the dumbed down unintelligent lowliest shared
viewpoint of situations in their depth, instead made shallow, sold as daily
headline? the CODE makes it so, in brains and machinery and bureaucracy.
binary is the enforced and corrupted 'shared state', conceptually and
ideologically, yet it is a false belief.

the issue then of shared and unshared identity, belonging or not belonging
to this 'master/slave' thinking...

  shared ID <-----> unshared ID

And how this relates to default interpretations, the quickest route for
'feedback' and determining events based on perspective... are you binary or
paradoxical?

Can you make sense of your own consciousness or must you take on false
consciousness to function in society and go about decision-making in its
frameworks, taking on its value systems yet which fragment a person from
their own 'true' self, taking over and reformatting and reprogramming a
life to serve the machine agenda over and against 'shared humanity' -- now
an unshared identity, via private relativistic ideology. sell out your
ancestors and neighbors for a place in the machine...

Quickest route to thinking- *binary* of course, processor speed as if
SUPERSMART! --- "look- i can decide things and determine things
irrespective of their actual truth, and it works for me and others,
everyone else is just lazy!"  Like water flowing downhill, 'logical
reasoning' turned into Price is Right PLINKO game, quick and easy
'automated reasoning' via path of least resistance aided and abetted by
binary ideology, creating friction-free virtual universe, mind detached
from body by also flawed historical beliefs, enabling this madness its
onesided platform. the trope of largest prime 'uncorrected ideological
perspective' the trophy award for the most stupid, greedy, and ignorant. an
entire society and civilization built around rewarding those whose
activities align with this, against human conscience and its needs, that
then is viewed as the enemy.


--- major social dynamic ---

ideologically there is a differentiation in terms of the process of
reasoning, how information is parsed...

   intelligent <-----> smart

also, how shared identity may differ between empirical and relativistic
models of truth...

   truth <-----> partial truth

and the difference in conceptualization, reliance on how frameworks are
constructed, tested...

   ideas <-----> facts

and this directly relates to issues of observation and cybernetics (looping
circuitry)...

   fallible observer  <----->  infallible observer

   error-correction  <----->   no error correction

In this way 'inflated' or 'bubble' views can rely on warping, skew,
distortion for their truth which is verified by conforming to a false or
inaccurate model reliant on a limited *protected* or SECURED version of
pseudo-truth (pT), as if shared empirical reality (T) removed of error,
because it is believed to be, via ideology.

  grounded empiricism <-----> ungrounded relativism

In this way a 'private worldview' can replace 'the public' view as if a
shared domain, and become the basis for one-sided 'reasoning' depending on
authoritative beliefs, where facts can be chosen to fit the model, others
discarded, to uphold the perimeter, basically privatizing perspective to a
finite inaccurate view as the exploit.

 reality (1) <-----> false-perspective (0)

 humanity <-----> the state (?)

There is always the possibility that this was planned in advance as a
cosmic setup from the beginning, and therefore the state could be doubled,
paradoxical, existing both in the shared truth of humans and in the lies of
the false viewpoint...

 humanity <----->  state (T|F)

In this way the two state solution could be moving those 'false' on the
side of humanity over to the false state, and the true state over to side
with humanity, via reversal of dynamics, trapping the exploiters within
their own rigged game...

 human state (1) <-----> rogue state (0)

And thus doubled or backdoor crypto could be vital to this process, itself
constituting the trap while transcending this context of surveillance and
putting it to use for human goals and values, working-through this hell
into the birth of new cosmic civilization, of shared identity, as this
relates to eco|soc|pol-issues, shared set evaluations for money and taxes
and policy and direction slash governance, versus the corrupt code and its
circuits etched into the world and minds today as pain, suffering, terror,
horror, insanity.

// * the following repeated text in case superscript numbers do not
translate, for reference:

In other words, instead of XYZ being a serial number that could extend
linearly onward toward infinity, that is: [xyz] ...[infinity], and that
"string" is a horizontal number or code, that can in particular be related
perhaps to binary on-off processing in a highly efficient manner,
processing and computational speed and largest prime numbers as context--
instead, the assumption for this same situation in another crypto framework
is that it could be happening 'vertically' like a slot machine that runs to
bounded infinities (largest primes or not), within each variable, and thus
[xyz] may not have a discernible linear structure or overall equation that
makes sense of the resulting 'horizontal' string. such that:

   [x][y][z] => [n^1][n^2][n^3]...[n^n]

whereby [n] is variable and could be anything- a number, a function, a
calculation, null, its own computation. And in this way, each variable
could tend towards infinity or its own structuring, within the string,
whose length is not so much the issue as the difficulty in resolving its
total structure, especially linearly, such that [n^123] would not be
decipherable running algorithms across its horizontal string and instead
solving for each variable or say grouped variables in the string, eg.
[n^1][n^2-3][n^4-9]

⚔
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 23357 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20130914/af2f1116/attachment-0001.txt>