[Cryptography] Why prefer symmetric crypto over public key crypto?

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Sun Sep 8 05:02:24 PDT 2013


----- Forwarded message from Tony Arcieri <bascule at gmail.com> -----

Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 15:40:08 -0700
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule at gmail.com>
To: Ray Dillinger <bear at sonic.net>
Cc: Crypto <cryptography at metzdowd.com>
Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why prefer symmetric crypto over public key crypto?

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ray Dillinger <bear at sonic.net> wrote:

> And IIRC, pretty much every asymmetric ciphersuite (including all public-
> key crypto) is vulnerable to some transformation of Shor's algorithm that
> is in fact practical to implement on such a machine.


Lattice-based (NTRU) or code-based (McEliece/McBits) public key systems are
still considered "post-quantum" algorithms. There are no presently known
quantum algorithms that work against these sorts of systems.

See http://pqcrypto.org/

-- 
Tony Arcieri

_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography at metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography


----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org
AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B  47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5



More information about the cypherpunks mailing list