Media Gag of Barrett Brown Case

[Rich Jones]

"Perhaps without realizing the prejudicial effects on Brown, the media
repeatedly
has publicized potentially inadmissible and prejudicial information, such
as Brown’s
(1) incarceration status, (2) anarchist idealology, (3) three indictments
and potential
sentences, (4) admissions of conduct and involvement in Anonymous
activities,
(5) relationship to other Anonymous figures or hackers, (6) troubled
childhood and
alternative schooling, (7) declaration that he was an atheist, (8) use and
abuse of ecstasy,
acid, heroin, suboxine, and marijuana, (9) lack of steady employment, (10)
claimed
diagnoses of ADHD and depression, (11) associates descriptions of Brown as
a junkie,
name fag, moral fag, court jester, (12) self-proclaimed and otherwise
assigned titles with
Anonymous (spokesperson, senior strategist), (13) receipt of data stolen
through hacks
conducted by other Anonymous members, (14) use of the stolen data to prank
call
individuals, publicize personal and confidential information, (15)
associates and Brown
opining that Brown would end up in jail, and (16) property seized by FBI."

Is the prosecution assuming the judge knows what namefagging is?

Also, what do "reserved" exhibits mean? Are those to be presented at a
later date?

R
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3365 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20130904/f0040c44/attachment-0001.txt>