Curious use of cpunks list [Brian Carroll]

[David Vorick]

Personally I've found these posts to be very curious, and while I have no
idea what to make of most of them, they can be interesting to read and I've
enjoyed having them on the list.

Even if they aren't explicity on topic.


On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 1:15 AM, grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:

> Please consider writing a whitepaper on the subject of
> whatever it is you're trying to say and then posting a link
> to it here with a one paragraph summary for readers.
> And if you are, or rather than, using this list (as previously
> surmised by others) as the rough equivalent of your own
> numbers station, there are surely better places to broadcast
> this material... nntp, a hidden service webpage, an actual
> numbers list (which you could ask the cpunks maintainer to set up).
> Curiosities are presumably welcome here, but really, this?
> The archives do not indicate much of an audience.
> Perhaps I've missed something? So I defer to any simple on topic
> summary and/or explanation which might move others to go back
> and digest it all for its suggested value and comment therein.
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1461 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20131016/e5791d86/attachment-0001.txt>