<nettime> Pascal Zachary: Rules for the Digital Panopticon (IEEE)

[Eugen Leitl]

----- Forwarded message from Felix Stalder <felix at openflows.com> -----

Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:19:31 +0200
From: Felix Stalder <felix at openflows.com>
To: a moderated mailing list for net criticism <nettime-l at mail.kein.org>
Subject: Re: <nettime> Pascal Zachary: Rules for the Digital Panopticon (IEEE)
Message-ID: <5257B493.1010201 at openflows.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
Reply-To: a moderated mailing list for net criticism <nettime-l at mail.kein.org>

The concept of the panopticon has been very popular ever since Foucault
elevated it to the rank of a central metaphor for modernity in
"Discipline and Punishment" (1975). And the NSA revelations seem to
confirm its usefulness once again.

But I think this is mistaken. We are not living in a panoptic world at
all, at least not in the Bentham/Foucault sense of the term (is there
any other?).

I follow here largely Zygmunt Bauman, one of the last negative thinkers
in the European tradition. He makes two arguments against in this regard:

First: "Today's Big Brother is not about keeping people in and making
them stick to the line, but about kicking people out and making sure
that when they are kicked out that they will duly go and won't come back."

And, more importantly, Bauman argues, power hates the
responsibility/costs that comes with being a prison guard / running a
prison (assuming they have not been turned into a source of profit).
They don't want to be tied down, together with the inmates. They want
to be mobile, weightless and separate.

So surveillance has been decentralized and turned into task performed
by the prison inmates themselves, and make into a precondition for
staying inside: think credit ratings, facebook friends, google ranks
etc. You have to make yourself continuously and actively available for
surveillance, provide your own data, in your own time and at your own
costs, in order to avoid big brother to jump into action and kick you
out.

Some people are using the concept of "ban-opticon" to express this.



On 10/10/2013 08:41 PM, Patrice Riemens wrote:
> 
> original to:
> http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/software/rules-for-the-digital-panopticon

<...>

-- 

 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| http://felix.openflows.com
 |OPEN PGP: 056C E7D3 9B25 CAE1 336D 6D2F 0BBB 5B95 0C9F F2AC



#  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
#  <nettime>  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime at kein.org

----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org
AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B  47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5