[tor-talk] Freenet and hidden services

[Eugen Leitl]

----- Forwarded message from str4d <str4d at i2pmail.org> -----

Date: Mon,  7 Oct 2013 10:58:41 +0000 (UTC)
From: str4d <str4d at i2pmail.org>
To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Freenet and hidden services
X-Mailer: smtp.postman.i2p - Official I2P Mailer
Message-Id: <20131007105841.28054AE2B3 at smtp.postman.i2p>
Reply-To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

I consider Tahoe-LAFS to be the (current) best solution for this. It
provides a distributed data store, which can be used for hosting (with
a Javascript "web server"). I know Tahoe works with Tor via SOCKS but
I don't personally know of any active networks. Tahoe has been used in
I2P as a distributed data store for a long time, and there are several
"deepsites" hosted in it. We are actively working to make Tahoe
integrate better with Tor/I2P.

Zooko recently posted a *much* better summary of this:
https://cpunks.org//pipermail/cypherpunks/2013-October/001242.html

str4d

On 10/07/2013 08:11 PM, Jerzy Łogiewa wrote:
> Do you mean if Tor wold have distributed data store like freenet?
> 
> Nice idea, please implement this. :~
> 
> -- Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerzyma at interia.eu
> 
> On Oct 6, 2013, at 3:26 AM, It's Good to be Alive wrote:
> 
>> Hi, I'm fairly new at Tor, and this is my first time on a mailing
>> list, so if there's a better place to ask, let me know.  Are
>> there any plans, long-term or short, for augmenting Tor with
>> Freenet-style resilient, distributed, encrypted hosting in place
>> of the current hidden-service model?  I understand that they are
>> different projects with different goals, but in the wake of the
>> Freedom Hosting fiasco it seems that the idea has merit.
>> Certainly both sides would benefit? Freenet is not always
>> anonymous, and hidden services are not always resilient, but
>> together...  What are the pros and cons of this idea, and what
>> stands in the way of implementing it?  Just curious. Cheers!
>> Thanks for your time.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSUpPHAAoJENXeOJaUpGWyy/4H/36aYQmjKCPYxT8SdYEL2vOV
IJ/vhIhWFeSkS/VKXtMHyP272HR+J+oTQ+IqeFYVD+MZFXWB3+lpoqkvsG8YhCDY
yq2k7M8y37vnxwt+KhrEL4Ql6tcwHuA4LcePw9mT1EiPhDFrUKCa2HBIz6SZ7IDz
NNN9ISBkt4eslF9k3vUnqWUA4S/Wd4geTtKMJBxgIfXzt0p/ppSm5LR8tSwo/Yxc
QMB4SL0toj1srv/fjFKR/Gy4TU3rww9sCr0rDlTtlOx8JVjc9imEynq00WIlQwi1
x1jDLvKvqg2hricJjVMHXRwhERadQjgg2FHxyaE2fpfhOZ6uHjZ7U9XLZTpEFnM=
=gliq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
To unsusbscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://ativel.com http://postbiota.org
AC894EC5: 38A5 5F46 A4FF 59B8 336B  47EE F46E 3489 AC89 4EC5