bitcoin as a global medium of exchange (was Re: Interesting take on Sanjuro's Assassination Market)
Jim Bell
jamesdbell8 at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 25 23:51:22 PST 2013
We can certainly agree on that! The new currency should be as anonymous as Zerocoin. (I can think of an application that will require robust anonymity.)
Jim Bell
________________________________
From: David Vorick <david.vorick at gmail.com>
I have faith that additional cryptocurrencies will be launched/released that are substantially better and different from bitcoin. Bitcoin is just the beginnning, and ultimately I don't think it will make more than a few years farther before there is an unquestioned replacement.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:53 AM, James A. Donald <jamesd at echeque.com> wrote:
On 2013-11-26 11:43, David Vorick wrote:
>
>Andy, the problem isn't the denomination, the problem is that Satioshi
>>has 5% of all the currency, and the Winklevoss twins have another 0.5%.
>>If bitcoin becomes worth 100 trillion dollars, they've got a solid 500
>>billion for being nobody and doing nothing. That's a problem to me.
>>
>Five hundred billion for freeing the world financial system from US domination without bloodshed. Sounds mighty cheap to me.
>
>I am, however worried that bitcoin can be dominated by a small group. As the total transaction volume increases, the number of people that are full and equal participants in recording and facilitating transactions must diminish.
>
>This was my original objection, scaling failure, way back in the beginning, and it is now coming true.
>
>But even if my worst fears are realized, that is still a whole lot better than what we have now.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 3813 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20131125/6a2fc2b6/attachment-0001.txt>
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list