On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 08:00:08PM +0100, rysiek wrote: > inb4 "Java suxxorz" -- yes, I tend to hold that view myself; hoever, if > RetroShare is a workable solution, we can simply add C++/Python/Whatever > implementations later, right? Of course it is possible to add memory/type unsafe implementations later. Actually, RetroShare is developed in C++/QT.