patents in a free society (Re: Brother can you help a fiber?)

[Juan Garofalo]

--On Friday, November 08, 2013 1:05 PM -0800 Jim Bell
<jamesdbell8 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Sure, it's a problem if that patent system is enforced
> solely by 'government', and someday this problem ought to be fixed.    
>   I fully agree that it would be better if there was some sort of
> voluntary-ist 'patent system'.  For example, a mark on a product (like
> circle-C for copyright, and "UL" for Underwriters Labs, etc) which
> identifies that the manufacturer complies with some voluntary patent
> system.  Companies (such as Telcos, Internet Co's, Costco, Walmart, etc)
> might announce and agree that they would only buy and sell goods and
> services which meet the voluntary-patent-system standards.

	And libertarians would sell whatever they wanted to sell according to the
libertarian principle of free trade. Also, you seem to be assuming that the
big business that exist in today's fascist 'market' will exist in a real
free market? 

	
> Under that
> situation, it might be rather difficult for non-patent-compliant items to
> be marketed.  

	I don't think so...


> We'd have the same system, but simply not
> government-enforced.      You said:  " My threshold is if any
> strongly competent engineer can dream this idea up in a week when asked
> the same questions, its clearly a junk patent designed to sabotage and
> leach off other peoples productivity."     I certainly agree.  If
> all such improperly-granted patents weren't granted, that would solve 99%
> of the problem with the patent system.
> 
>     Regarding my invention:  On my release from prison December 19,
> 2009, I promptly used an online service (freepatentsonline.com) and
> discovered that there had been three patents granted on
> isotopically-modified optical-fibers.  Two granted to Corning in about
> 2004, (6810197  6870999) and one to Deutsche Telekom in about 2002  (
> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6490399.html  ).  For 30 minutes, I
> was afraid that they had scooped me, only to find that their inventions
> hadn't made the same isotopic changes that I had  invented. 
>     Keep in mind that I, having made my invention, am essentially
> obligated to employ the existing patent systems, until another one
> appears.  Otherwise, I lose whatever rights I might have in the
> future.        Jim Bell
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Adam Back <adam at cypherspace.org>
> To: Cathal Garvey (Phone) <cathalgarvey at cathalgarvey.me> 
> Cc: Jim Bell <jamesdbell8 at yahoo.com>; cypherpunks at cpunks.org; Adam Back
> <adam at cypherspace.org>  Sent: 
> Subject: patents in a free society (Re: Brother can you help a fiber?)
>  
> 
> In my opinion patents and copyright are incompatible with a free society
> and crypto-anarchy: ie with the right to privately contract, and right to
> cryptograhically enforced privacy (encryption), and freedom of association
> (pseudonymous/anonymous networks).
> 
> You'd think Jim would get that given is previous explorations of the
> darker side of Tim May's cyphernomicon catalog of ideas...
> 
> Patents are also stupidly destructive as the technical world is filled
> with literally millions of junk patents, with redudant overlap, so you
> cant do anything without tripping over 100s of junk patents.  Even the
> USG finally started to try to belatedly reform the idiocy.
> 
> (Without any aspersions of the junk or non junk status of Jim's patent as
> I am not a hardware guy).  My threshold is if any strongly competent
> engineer can dream this idea up in a week when asked the same questions,
> its clearly a junk patent designed to sabotage and leach off other
> peoples productivity.
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:12:53AM +0000, Cathal Garvey (Phone) wrote:
>>    I look forward to a world without patents, so I'm afraid all that
>>    waffle about obtaining a worldwide government-enforced-monopoly
>> merely    made me sigh a bit.