Joke

[Juan Garofalo]

--On Friday, December 13, 2013 7:31 PM -0800 Tom Ritter <tom at ritter.vg>
wrote:

> I doubt it - abuse through Tor is a legitimate problem.  


	Not sure what that means. At any rate, there seems to be something wrong
with the bitcoin forum blocking anonymous(sort-of) access, no?

	
 


> Wikipedia blocks
> editing from Tor for the same reason.


	ah, wikipedia....


> 
> There are ideas for solving this though, and it would be cool to see more
> ideas, and more fleshing out of them.  Mike Hearn has talked about having
> people make a bitcoin deposit for an account, and after so much time of
> legitimate use, the deposit is refunded. 


	Legitimate use? Such as? Parroting whatever garbge the 'wikipedia editors'
say it must be parroted? 


> Before that, if it's used for
> abuse, the deposit is kept by the service.

	That's cool. So, say something those idiots don't like, and they 'keep'
(steal) your money. 




> 
> -tom
>