Bruce Schneier to leave BT
Andy Isaacson
adi at hexapodia.org
Mon Dec 16 11:54:55 PST 2013
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 08:29:55AM -0800, coderman wrote:
> retaliation for helping expose intelligence community excesses and
> illegalities?
Unlikely; not impossible, but I doubt it was actual retaliation. Bruce
denies it:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/12/16/bruce_schneier_leaves_bt/
Schneier told The Register this evening of his departure: "This has
nothing to do with the NSA. No, they [BT] weren't happy with me, but
they knew that I am an independent thinker and they didn't try to
muzzle me in any way. It's just time. I spent seven years at BT, and
seven years at Counterpane Internet Security, Inc before BT bought
us. It's past time for something new.
As to the future: Answer, cloudy; ask again later."
Circa 2009 Bruce had some amusing off-the-record stories of previous
interactions with the BT hierarchy. Bruce at BT was never a clean fit,
but BT profited greatly by, as they say in the article's leaked email,
having someone who can challenge their expectations.
Staying at a single gig for 14 years is quite remarkable in the tech
industry.
All that said, there are still things that one Cannot Say when one has
$CORP on one's business card. Just as a simple example, the doctrine
of "judicial notice" means that if an officer of a corporation makes a
public statement about something and the corporation does not publish a
correction, a court can assume that the statement is true in a later
civil proceeding. The company can counter the presumption or clarify
the necessary context by presenting evidence, but it's expensive and
means you're burning minutes/pages on refuting nonsense. So execs need
to be careful not to say, for example, that "$CORP has poor network
security" because that's food for a nuisance lawsuit.
I hope Bruce can use his newfound free time to do additional reporting
on the docs. Good news!
-andy
More information about the cypherpunks
mailing list