Avaaz in "grave danger" due to GMail spam filters

[rysiek]

Dnia poniedziałek, 19 sierpnia 2013 13:10:05 Lodewijk andré de la porte pisze:
> That's why he said spam-ish, not spam.
> 
> Regardless it will make them be viewed much less. I think they're just
> "taking eggs for their money". They know it's a lot to ask from people to
> switch away from gmail. They love their arsefuckings.
> 
> They might not have thought about the "big ridiculously high, then concede
> to something high"-tactic. "Please, people, stop using gmail". Everyone:
> "Noo! We love Gmail!". "Then at least send an e-mail back to fix gmail".
> Everyone: "That sounds reasonable." instead of "please fix gmail". Everyone
> "naah too much effort".

This. Also, it wouldn't cost them a dime to add a sentence or two explaining 
why centralisation is the problem and how using other e-mail providers can 
help.

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20130819/e340d6ff/attachment-0002.sig>