NSLs, gag-orders, code-changes, coerced backdoors - any tech response? (Re: Lavabit and End-point Security)

[Lee Azzarello]

Alexander Galloway wrote a wonderful text on decentralized control titled
Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralization. Worth the read.

-lee
 On Aug 21, 2013 8:54 PM, "rysiek" <rysiek at hackerspace.pl> wrote:

> Dnia środa, 21 sierpnia 2013 13:20:53 Lodewijk andré de la porte pisze:
> > Torrents show. Bitcoin shows.
> >
> > Common protocol, many clients, graceful as possible failures, distributed
> > everything.
> >
> > Else you'll always have a centralized something that can get broken.
>
> This is so very true. Decentralisation is the only way to go, IMVHO. And
> the
> lower network level we can decentralise, the better.
>
> I'd like to see decentralisation-in-depth happening. As in: decentralised,
> peer-to-peer communication services in a dynamically routed network built
> on
> top of physical mesh.
>
> With that in mind I love what Project Byzantium is doing, for example. The
> elements are slowly getting into place, at some point we will get there,
> I'm
> sure.
>
> --
> Pozdr
> rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 1327 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20130821/ec3a8044/attachment-0001.txt>