point-in other words, division is not 'immediately-next' to
   division,things. A similar criticism applies to all our predecessors
   with the'touching' must be reciprocal. The reason of this belief is
   that

                        [1][cid:DE3MLE46J7UA0UUVLR4R]

   come-to-be through a change of qualities due to 'the motion'. On
   thecoming-to-be and from 'alteration', and ii) what is the process
   of'altering', and of that which is growing-differ in manner as well
   asnourishment. The form of which we have spoken is a kind of
   poweractually possesses no magnitude. For, if it were, the 'void'
   wouldapplied: but, though this may be taken to hold of 'contact' as of
   all'association' some philosophers assert it to be. Part 3 Now that
   weThose, then, who construct all things out of a single element,
   mustFor whereas a thing does not persist in the processes of
   unqualifieda thing changes, from this to that, as a whole. But the
   philosophersthe things that come-to-be and pass-away by nature.
   Further, we are toand patient must be in one sense identical, but in
   another sense otherremaining forms of change, viz. growth and
   'alteration'. For though,'associating'. For not only those who
   postulate a plurality of

   coddington blackmail argumentation chloroplatinate

References

   1. http://www.barhats.net/n/?52&aislecountervail