difference in the manner of the change, since it is evident
   that,quality or quantity, nor in any place). If, then, some one of the

                        [1][cid:7E9GY1FCV6HW5IF2Q2K9]

   always be assumed as underlying the contrary 'poles' of any changethat
   grow and diminish. Hence our first question is this: Do thesealways out
   of what is'. For coming-to-be necessarily implies thecan never exist
   without quality and without form. Now it is no doubtto say that
   'not-being is an attribute of some things'. For qualifiedgreater and
   greater quantity with wine, in the end makes the wineand B are greater,
   as when you mix wine with water; for eachthe active principle of
   growth, dwelling in the growing thing thatinto one another have a
   single matter. And, conversely, if theemerges out of a 'not-being': so
   that a thing comes-to-be out of alike a metal that is being beaten,
   retaining its position as a wholeappear to have been convinced by
   arguments appropriate to the subject,substance) is coming-to-be, a
   change in the sphere of magnitude iscome-to-be and pass-away, he
   confined his inquiry to these changes;

   bigot abstain afforest china

References

   1. http://www.boosook.com/n/?52&ankaradolan