[thingiverse] 3D printing & intellectual property rights - So why

Michael at Oz Michael at Oz
Tue Dec 10 11:45:29 PST 2019


are we bothering with GPL,CC etc licenses?
To: thingiverse at googlegroups.com


I came across the following and thought a precis may be handy.

It implies much of what is on the 'verse is not copyrightable (apart from
the artistic stuff), just useful articles.
It would even be questionable whether scad programs are copyright.

So are the licensing aspects bogus? I started out thinking so, but read
on...

http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting

*"In a practical sense, copyrights and patents are mutually exclusive. If
you have a useful article you cannot protect it with a copyright.
Conversely, you will not be issued a patent on an artistic
work.[9]<http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting#_ftn9>That
means that if something is eligible for patent protection b even if it
does not have patent protection b it cannot be protected by copyright. This
dichotomy is part of the reason why most of the physical world is not
protected by any type of intellectual property. Most physical objects serve
some utilitarian function, which means that they are not eligible for
>copyright protection."*

*"As 3D printing and modeling grow in popularity, it is likely that we will
see more companies and individuals assuming they have a copyright for a
design or object and demanding removal of unauthorized versions. While most
modern songs, movies, and pictures are protected by copyright, the same
cannot be said for physical objects. For that reason, when a site receives
a takedown request it may be wise to at least consider if the object is
protected by copyright in the first place."*

"*For 3D printing, this digital form is often that of an .stl
file.<http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting#_ftn43>These
files can be thought of as the object equivalent of a .pdf file b
they are more or less universally printable by 3D printers and allow
objects to be transferred digitally around the
world.<http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting#_ftn44>But
are they protected by copyright? And if they are protected by copyright,
what does that mean? *

* .Stl files are certainly protect able by copyright. Copyright law
specifically mentions "maps, globes, charts, diagrams, models, and
technical drawings, including architectural plans" as included within the
scope of works eligible for
protection.<http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting#_ftn45>
 However, that does not automatically mean that every design file for
a
physical object is actually protected by copyright. *
* *

* After all, if a given diagram is the only practical way to virtually
represent a physical object, a copyright on that diagram would prevent
anyone from making any virtual versions of the
object.<http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting#_ftn46>This
would give the holder of that copyright a great deal of control over
the distribution and manufacture of the object itself. *
* In order to avoid this outcome, copyright law limits the copyrightability
of these types of works"

"Furthermore, even if the design file is protected by copyright, creating a
physical version will not infringe on any copyright that exists in the
file. No copyright on the design of a useful object extends copyright
protection to the object itself." ..."**Furthermore, there is some
indication that copying a file of a useful object protected by copyright
for the purposes of creating the useful object is not copyright
infringement."

*

*"One way to avoid some of these thorny copyright questions is by
distributing objects and designs with permissive licenses such as those
provided by Creative Commons.Unfortunately this solution can break down
when applied to physical objects beyond the scope of copyright. To put it
simply, you cannot license what you do not have."*

*"All of that being said, licensing of noncopyrightable files can serve at
least two useful purposes b one legal and one cultural.*
* *

*"The legal purpose is something of a hedge against future legal change. As
detailed in this paper, there are many open questions surrounding just what
types (and parts) of objects are and are not protectable by copyright.
Granting a license today means that the usage conditions of the object are
clear no matter how copyright law evolves in the future. As long as the
creator does not believe that merely granting the license gives them the
right to control non-copyrightable parts of the work, there is little
downside to futureproofing the status of the object.*
* *

*The second, cultural, purpose is probably the more important one.
Licensing can be an important signaling device even when it is not legally
enforceable. Attaching a Creative Commons license is a signal that the
creator wants to include her work in an ever-expanding and evolving network
of creativity. It gives the rest of the community confidence that they can
build on the object."*

*
*


<http://www.publicknowledge.org/Copyright-3DPrinting#_ftn55>

-- 
-- 
Go visit thingiverse at http://thingiverse.com and stay tuned to the blog
at http://blog.thingiverse.com.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "thingiverse" group.
To post to this group, send email to thingiverse at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
thingiverse+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/thingiverse?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"thingiverse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to thingiverse+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.





-- 
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507

-- 
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio at googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en
Learn more at www.diybio.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to diybio+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to diybio at googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list