[ZS] Troll Attack Patterns
Michael Hrenka
metahorse at gmail.com
Sat Feb 9 07:42:40 PST 2013
I know a little bit about how trolls operate. There are different types of
trolls, but most of them present a threat to the community that is trolled.
So, the community needs some awareness of the attack patterns in order to
withstand such attacks.
I was an active member of a certain small community, let's call it
community X. X has a charismatic leader, let's call him Z, with radical
ideas about progress, community, and stuff like that. Because Z wants a
large high quality community and it is hard to find candidates with the
required prerequisites ("really freely thinking individuals" or so), Z
resorts to an unconventional strategy of member recruitment which I call
"forum fishing" for simplicity. It consists in entering forums of other
communities and advertising the ideals of X. Members are encouraged to
check out X, because it's really great and so on (which is not too far from
the truth actually). At the same time the targeted community C is
criticized in different ways:
1. It is criticised for not upholding the ideals of X.
2. It is criticised for supporting destructive ideals which are detrimental
to individuals.
3. It is criticised for being stupid, dysfunctional and inefficient.
4. It is criticised for not even sticking to its own ideals and rules.
5. It is criticised for a bad administration style, which is characterized
as despotic.
Many points that the infiltration group of X make are thoughtful, true, and
justified. But at the same time the group is quite vehement and aggressive,
which sooner or later gets them flagged as trolls. They react by pointing
out that they are acting in accordance with the rules, even if the C admins
have erroneous differing positions and that they have good intentions.
Often, a few members of C agree with the X members and consider joining X.
These individuals may be painted as traitors by the C admins. But that
reaction makes the accused traitors likely to question their allegiance to
C and likely to join X instead.
Sooner or later, the infiltrators from X are kicked out of C, possibly
together with some sympathizers. But they will have incited hot discussions
about values, ideals, administration styles, and perhaps even recruited a
few intelligent and open minded members for X. The reactions of the C
admins will have antagonized a couple of C members, so they will leave,
rebel, or generally will feel unwelcome, protest, and cause further
trouble. In any case, the free expression of ideas will be restricted to
some degree. The community C may become more dictatorial, up to the point
of becoming an empty shell that doesn't remind anyone of the what it once
was. It may split up because of that or just die silently.
And those were the benign trolls. Now I'll explain the methods of malignant
trolls. The motive of the malignant troll is to destroy the targeted
community, or to take it over, or to cause as much trouble as possible.
Let's call the targeted community C. It is not without irony that I was an
admin of X when it was infiltrated by malignant trolls.
Malignant trolls infiltrate hard and deep. They try to earn the trust of C
members, and especially C admins. If they are good, they will not come
alone, but as a highly coordinated trolling troupe "T". Once a single
member of T gains admin status, the other members of T will also get that
status soon. Sooner or later a significant fraction of C admins belong to
T. Once they are in that position, it is hard to remove them. Here's what
happens if someone identifies them as infiltrators and takes action against
them:
1. T denies that they are a problem for C. Instead T members claim that
they are highly beneficial for C.
2. The offending C member will be accused of being unjust and will be
defamed until he loses his status in C.
3. Defamation campaigns can include banning the offending member (remember:
T has a lot of admins) and creating fake accounts who claim to be the
banned member. The fake account write lots of nonsense which makes the
original C member look bad. Additional T members or fake accounts of T
members join in to corroborate that the initial C member needs to be
excluded from the community forever.
4. If members of T are banned, the bans are reversed by T admins and the C
member who tried to remove a T member is blamed for his "misbehaviour" and
targeted for further attacks.
5. If T is threatened with defeat nevertheless, T may make serious threats:
Psychological terror, physical attacks, legal action, etc. These threats
are probably not serious, but the problem is that one doesn't actually know
that.
In general, a troll troupe T consists of many different accounts:
1. The account of the master troll
2. Accounts of other members of T
3. Fake accounts of T members for additional impact
4. Fake accounts that claim to be accounts of genuine C members.
With all these fake and supporting accounts it is really hard to delineate
between T members and genuine C members. Without real awareness of what
might be going on, there will be hell of a chaos. C can only resist the
chaos effectively if it uses communication channels with are not
infiltrated, yet. Private emails, phone calls, and private meetings are
generally hard to be infiltrated and can therefore be seen as rather safe.
How to defend against such attacks?
1. Have a clear identity and sensible principles.
2. Stick to your principles.
3. Have a brilliant team of admins who are reasonable and not too paranoid.
4. Don't give potential trolls power. People with power should be
"screened" to guarantee that they are loyal to the community.
5. Private communication - lots of it.
How to differentiate between trolls and genuine members?
* Know them!
* Trolls are generally not very constructive
* Malignant trolls are rather cynical, unfriendly, and nihilistic, but
demand fair treatment nevertheless, or even preferential treatment.
* Trolls are unlikely to be loyal to the ideals of the community.
I hope this was helpful. Zero State is too precious to be a victim to
trolls and other infiltrators.
--
--
Zero State mailing list:
http://groups.google.com/group/DoctrineZero
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Doctrine Zero" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to DoctrineZero+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list