<nettime> Bitcoin, the end of the Taboo on Money
Carsten Agger
agger at modspil.dk
Mon Apr 8 01:29:56 PDT 2013
Florian Cramer wrote:
> What I fail to understand is why you consider this a political gain
> (to quote your paper):
Felix Stalder wrote:
> Or, if you see "the state" inherently tied to dominant interests and
> therefore working against the interests of the majority. And then, the
> current state of affairs would be merely a more open display of what
> which is normal, though usually less well visible. This is, basically,
> the anarchist/libertarian position.
>
> If you believe the latter, then I think one of the difficulties lies
> in how to fight "the state" (say, through promoting bitcoin) without
> falling onto the trap of promoting the market as the alternative form
> of marco-coordination (which is what US-type libertarians advocate).
First of all, the problem of no state control and of taxation will soon be
moot, I think. For the moment Bitcoin exists in a legal limbo, but as
their value and importance continue to increase, states will start
treating them as assets with a market value which must be declared - as
some sort of digital gold.
When it comes to that, bitcoin transfers may still be anonymous and
untraceable, but people will be legally required to declare the amount of
Bitcoin they receive for services rendered, and they will be subject to
taxation. I think this is quite inevitable, unless the use of Bitcoin is
banned (which I also don't see coming).
This means that in the long run, Bitcoin can't be used to avoid taxes, on
any financial transactions or anything else - at leat not legally so. The
fact that it's easier to avoid taxes by using Bitcoin is beside the point -
what matters is that it will be illegal and punishable by law. The current
legal limbo of Bitcoin is only due to the fact that it's not only not
officially acknowledged as legal tender, it's not even acknowledged as
valuable assets.
So what will be left when it comes to that is a currency which is not
controlled by any state, and which can be spent anonymously as if it were
cash, but digitally. And that's still worth a lot. I'm sceptical, though:
It's not possible to create fake Bitcoins, but since Bitcoin is build on
free software, it wouldn't be too hard to build an alternative network
based on the same protocol . In fact, thousands of such networks could be
built, and that could end up undermining Bitcoin's uniqueness, thus causing
a crash. I.e., I'm still suspicious that Bitcoin might end its days as a
pump and dump scheme, which will be fortunate for those smart enough to
sell their stock at the right time.
As monetary alternatives, I find the idea of local currencies like the
Puma in Sevilla (https://monedasocialpuma.wordpress.com/, and hundreds of
other LETS schemes) much more interesting, as they rely on building a real
community of people geared towards helping each other. I see Bitcoin as
something that's pulling more towards a Randian free-for-all.
best,
Carsten
--
http://www.modspil.dk
# distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
# <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime at kein.org
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list