[p2p-hackers] Bitcoin incentive on Kademlia networks
James A. Donald
jamesd at echeque.com
Sun Nov 4 00:07:16 PDT 2012
On 2012-11-03 6:32 PM, ianG wrote:
>
> Beyond this simple statement, however, is a sea of ideas, in which one
> can easily drown. E.g., you've identified a simple exchange process,
> discovered a weakness, and then proposed a reputation system to cover
> the weakness. Adding a reputation system to solve issues is like a
> deux ex machina in systems; Rep systems are little understood and
> generally or frequently crap, so chances are you'll end up building
> something that won't work, and wasting a lot of time in doing it.
Price discovery is hard, and reputation systems are hard.
Nonetheless, we need price discovery, and we need reputation systems. I
am not sure how to get there from here.
But yes, there is no point in fixing a problem which is hard to solve,
with a solution to a problem that no one has yet adequately solved.
>
> Mojo Nation tried to be an economically informed p2p system, but seemed
> to run out of grunt as a project. It failed because it tried to solve
> every problem, and drowned.
Mojo failed to address the problem of price discovery, which was central.
I would say Mojo drowned of insufficient ambition, rather than excessive
ambition.
Xanadu failed of excessive ambition
_______________________________________________
p2p-hackers mailing list
p2p-hackers at lists.zooko.com
http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list