They’re Watching: Homeland Security Tracking Visitors Across Alternative News and Prepper Web Sites

[J.A. Terranson]

While I have no doubt whatsoever that NSA is passively intercepting the 
majority (if not close to all) of the Internet traffic, this article is 
making claims that make no snse. In fact, the authors seem to have a 
fundamental misunderstanding of how te Internet actually works.  Why would 
NSA or anyone else leave cookies laying around for paanoid folk to find?  
It's certainly not necessary for the performance of the surveillance 
mission, and in fact endangers suc a mission - interception above layer 3 
just doesnt make a lot of sense, especially wen reconstruction of the 
higher layer activities is such a straightfoward matter if you capture all 
the layer 3 traffic.

I don't doubt that "we are all suspects now", or that NSA is watcing, but 
I seriously doubt that they are watching the way thse guys believe.  It 
sounds to me like these websites realized that FBI visitors were looking 
at the site and then assumed a lot of facts not in evidence.  Hell, I've 
had LOTS of lettered government visits to various web pages, whether by 
bored employes or for active surveillance - but none of those logged 
visits can be considered to be "secret" surveillance: after all, they left 
logs of their visits for chrissakes!

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Eugen Leitl wrote:

> http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/theyre-watching-homeland-security-tracking-visitors-across-alternative-news-and-prepper-web-sites_03212012
> 
> Theybre Watching: Homeland Security Tracking Visitors Across Alternative News
> and Prepper Web Sites
> 
> Mac Slavo
> 
> March 21st, 2012
> 
> SHTFplan.com
> 
> Comments (139)
> 	
> Just because youbre paranoid doesnbt mean theybre not out to get you.
> 
> If there ever existed individuals and groups that threatened the status quo
> itbs now, and they can often be found congregating at alternative news web
> sites, forums and preparedness oriented online communities. Government
> officials at the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have done
> everything in their power to marginalize their dangerous ideas and activities
> going so far as to even issue security bulletins to private businesses like
> banks, surplus stores, coffee shops and other retailers outlining what
> employees should look for and when to say something to law enforcement
> officials. Activities like putting a Ron Paul bumper sticker on your car,
> paying cash, buying gold, stocking up on food, promoting b
anti-U.S.b
 and
> b
radical theologies,b
 and demanding personal privacy are all now considered
> to be suspicious in the eyes of a government hell bent on destroying the
> Constitution.
> 
> While DHS has requisitioned the help of brick and mortar businesses in their
> efforts to identify persons-of-interest, they have realized that the best
> place to locate domestic threats to national security is the internet. As
> such, they have deployed a host of tools to not only monitor what is being
> posted online, but who is posting it, who their friends are, which sites they
> visit and what information they blikeb in particular.
> 
> A recent report from well known survival author James Rawles suggests that
> Preparedness oriented web sites are a prime target of government snooping and
> sniffing. A web site like Rawlesb Survival Blog, or even our very own
> SHTFplan, undoubtedly meets all of the criteria outlined in the multitude of
> security bulletins issued by DHS and FBI, thus it would only make sense that
> these types of communities would be primary destinations for government
> monitoring. In the case of Survival Blog, Rawles reports that a recent
> analysis of his logs by web forensic experts yielded some startling results:
> 
>     It has come to my attention that from August of 2011 to November of 2011,
> the FBI secretly redirected the web traffic of more than 10% of
> SurvivalBlogbs US visitors through CJIS, their sprawling data center situated
> on 900 acres, 10 miles from Clarksburg, West Virginia. There, the Feebees
> surreptitiously collected the IP addresses of my site visitors. In all, 4,906
> of 35,494 selected connections ended up going to or through the FBI servers.
> (Note that this happened several months beforewe moved our primary server to
> Sweden.) Furthermore, we discovered that the FBI attached a long-lived cookie
> that allowed them to track the sites that readers subsequently visited. I
> suspect that the FBI has done the same to hundreds of other web sites. I find
> this situation totally abhorrent, and contrary to the letter of 4th Amendment
> as well as the intent of our Founding Fathers.
> 
>     I recognize that I am making this announcement at the risk of losing some
> readers.So be it. But I felt compelled to tell my readers immediately,
> because it was the honorable and forthright course of action.
> 
>     Working on my behalf, some volunteer web forensics experts dissected some
> cached version histories. (Just about everything is available on the
> Internet, and the footprints and cookie crumb trails that you leave are
> essentially there for a lifetime.) The volunteers found that the bulk of the
> FBI redirects were selected because of a readerbs association with
> b
Intellectual Propertyb
 infringing sites like the now defunct Megaupload.
> But once redirected, you were assigned a cookie.  However, some of these were
> direct connections to the SurvivalBlog site (around 4% of the total.) So if
> they had kept this practice up long enough and if you visited us enough times
> then the FBIbs computers would have given you a cookie. This has been
> verified with sniffer software.
> 
> Most alarming about this is that according to James Rawlesb analysis, usersb
> browsers were first redirected to an FBI server, then forced to download a
> cookie via their browser, and were then redirected back to his web site b the
> entire process unbeknownst to the end user because it happens almost
> instantly. Because the cookie isnbt removed unless you clear it from your
> browser (you can easily remove cookies manually) every web site subsequently
> visited by the user would then be logged by an FBI computer in real-time.
> 
> You can be assured that if the FBI is engaging in this type of surveillance,
> Survival Blog and other preparedness web sites arenbt alone. Chances are
> that, as Rawles mentions, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of web sites
> being tracked and monitored in similar fashion. A report from the Intel Hub
> confirms our suspicions, as do our own visitor logs, and webd venture to
> guess that most other web sites in the alternative news sphere will see
> similar access logs.
> 
> Perhaps for now the government surveillance net is somewhat limited to
> specific internet spheres of interest, as their surveillance infrastructure
> is still being constructed. But it wonbt be long, in fact less than 18
> months, before they have the ability to track every single phone call, text
> message, email, image and video upload, blog post, comment, search query and
> social networking activity in the world. Yes, thatbs right, EVERY SINGLE
> digital interaction:
> 
>     Via The Daily Crux:
> 
>     Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly
> named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency.
> 
>     A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle
> assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze,
> and store vast swaths of the worldbs communications, as they zap down from
> satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of
> international, foreign, and domestic networks.
> 
> As we highlighted in Everything You Do Is Monitored, the government is
> rapidly taking steps across the nationbs entire security apparatus and its
> ancillary arms such as major search engines, private banks,
> telecommunications companies and social networks to log, aggregate and
> analyze the behavior of individual users as well as groups to which they
> belong. To what end is anybodybs guess (but we could, of course, venture a
> few theories).
> 
> It should be perfectly clear. Whether youbre a prepper, alternative news
> buff, or none of the above, the government wants to know what youbre doing.
> No one is immune to the surveillance state.
> 
> Webre all suspects now.
> 
> Theybre watching.
> 
> Resources: Here are some things you can do to protect your privacy online:
> 
> -Anonymous Web Surfing (Article)
> 
> -Set up a Virtual Private Network to protect your web surfing identity
> 
> -The TOR Project: Open source, free anonymous browsing
> 
> -Surf the internet from public wireless access points (Article) 
> 
> Author: Mac Slavo Date: March 21st, 2012 Website: www.SHTFplan.com
> 
> Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be
> freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to
> the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission
> to reproduce this content in other media formats.
> 


//Alif

-- 
"A reputable physician does NOT: promise a cure; demand advance payment;
advertise."    [Capitalization as in original]

[1936] U.S. Public Health Service poster alerting the public to the
dangers of "Quack Cancer Cures" specifically, and "Quackery" in general.