[tahoe-dev] switching from introducers to gossip?
Greg Troxel
gdt at ir.bbn.com
Tue Jul 3 10:00:49 PDT 2012
Don't get me wrong -- I think the p2p style, which foolscap already
implements part of -- is sweet. I'd like to improve it, in the
interests of making Tahoe-LAFS deployment more automatic for
end-users. However, we should probably pay attention to the fact that
many of our current users do not use those features, and some of them
are actively requesting the ability to turn off those features.
Maybe some kind of friendly fork or more targeted packaging would help
us manage these diverging deployment scenarios?
What needs to be forked? Isn't it just a question of usage, with a mode
of client-only, server-only, or both, perhaps enabling reverse
connections, and a few other things? All these issues seem trivial in
terms of code weight relative to what we have now.
_______________________________________________
tahoe-dev mailing list
tahoe-dev at tahoe-lafs.org
https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list