[liberationtech] Drones for Human Rights

Thu Feb 2 17:19:19 PST 2012

I would venture to guess that a considerable factor is resources. Recent
FOIA responses<http://www.guernicamag.com/blog/3426/nick_turse_the_crash_and_burn/>state
that keeping a Predator drone in the air for 24 hours requires 170
personnel. Granted this is a) a Predator drone, and b) few (if any) on this
list would argue that the Military is an exemplar of efficiency, there is a
time and expense in supporting drones with a considerable range. I support
thinking about positive ways of exploiting technology but a greater
question might be: what is the goal of the operation?

I agree with the proposal that "Drones can reach places and see things cell
phones cannot." and I think on that front, there are a number of innovative
ways to approach transparency. For example, this past year students in
Chile used<http://techpresident.com/blog-entry/live-iphone-balloon-video-coverage-150000-student-rally-chile>a
weather balloon and an iPhone to provide coverage of a protest. Along
this line of thinking, what is the range, the type of coverage, and
requirements that should be considered?

Best,
J

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Nabiha Syed <nabiha.syed at gmail.com> wrote:

> It* is* surprising that it's not more widespread already, right? But it is
> getting more and more popular --the Drone Journalism
> Lab<http://dronejournalism.tumblr.com/about>is trying to encourage the
> use of drones, and I believe the
> Occupy folks<
> http://techland.time.com/2011/12/21/occupy-wall-streets-new-drone-the-occucopter/
> >have
> been using drones to monitor their encampments recently, too.
>
> As shameless self-promotion, I'll be interviewing Mickey
> Osterreicher<https://twitter.com/#!/nppalawyer>of the National Press
> Photographers Association about surveillance drones
> and drone journalism for the Harvard Law and Policy Review blog -- I'd be
> happy to share the link once it's up!
>
> Nabiha
>
>
>
> Nabiha Syed
> First Amendment Fellow
> The New York Times Company
> 620 Eighth Avenue
> New York, NY 10018
> nabiha.syed at nytimes.com | 212.556.5187
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Yosem Companys <companys at stanford.edu
> >wrote:
>
> > A group of Stanford students pitched this idea for a startup 8 years ago!
> >  And yet no one is doing it yet?
> >
> > YC
> >
> >
> >
> > **********************
> >
> > January 30, 2012
> >
> > Drones for Human Rights
> >
> > By ANDREW STOBO SNIDERMAN and MARK HANIS, New York Times
> >
> > DRONES are not just for firing missiles in Pakistan. In Iraq, the State
> > Department is using them to watch for threats to Americans. Itbs time we
> > used the revolution in military affairs to serve human rights advocacy.
> >
> > With drones, we could take clear pictures and videos of human rights
> > abuses, and we could start with Syria.
> >
> > The need there is even more urgent now, because the Arab Leaguebs
> observers
> > suspended operations last week.
> >
> > They fled the very violence they were trying to monitor. Drones could
> > replace them, and could even go to some places the observers, who were
> > escorted and restricted by the government, could not see. This we know:
> the
> > Syrian government isnbt just fighting rebels, as it claims; it is
> shooting
> > unarmed protesters, and has been doing so for months. Despite a ban on
> news
> > media, much of the violence is being caught on camera by ubiquitous
> > cellphones. The footage is shaky and the images grainy, but still they
> make
> > us YouTube witnesses.
> >
> > Imagine if we could watch in high definition with a birdbs-eye view. A
> > drone would let us count demonstrators, gun barrels and pools of blood.
> And
> > the evidence could be broadcast for a global audience, including
> diplomats
> > at the United Nations and prosecutors at the International Criminal
> Court.
> >
> > Drones are increasingly small, affordable and available to nonmilitary
> > buyers. For hundreds of thousands of dollars b no longer many millions b
> a
> > surveillance drone could be flying over protests and clashes in Syria.
> >
> > An environmental group, the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, has
> reported
> > that it is using drones to monitor illegal Japanese whaling in the waters
> > of the Southern Hemisphere. In the past few years, human-rights groups
> and
> > the actor and activist George Clooney, among others, have purchased
> > satellite imagery of conflict zones. Drones can see even more clearly,
> and
> > broadcast in real time.
> >
> > We could record the repression in Syria with unprecedented precision and
> > scope. The better the evidence, the clearer the crimes, the higher the
> > likelihood that the world would become as outraged as it should be.
> >
> > This sounds a lot like surveillance, and it would be. It would violate
> > Syrian airspace, and perhaps a number of Syrian and international laws.
> It
> > isnbt the kind of thing nongovernmental organizations usually do. But it
> is
> > very different from what governments and armies do. Yes, we (like them)
> > have an agenda, but ours is transparent: human rights. We have a duty,
> > recognized internationally, to monitor governments that massacre their
> own
> > people in large numbers. Human rights organizations have always done
> this.
> > Why not get drones to assist the good work?
> >
> > It may be illegal in the Syrian governmentbs eyes, but supporting Nelson
> > Mandela in South Africa was deemed illegal during the apartheid era. To
> fly
> > over Syriabs territory may violate official norms of international
> > relations, but governments do this when they support opposition groups
> with
> > weapons, money or intelligence, as NATO countries did recently in Libya.
> In
> > any event, violations of Syrian sovereignty would be the direct
> consequence
> > of the Syrian statebs brutality, not the imperialism of outsiders.
> >
> > There are some obvious risks and downsides to the drone approach. The
> > Syrian government would undoubtedly seize the opportunity to blame a
> > foreign conspiracy for its troubles. Local operators of the drones could
> be
> > at risk, though a higher-end drone could be controlled from a remote
> > location or a neighboring country.
> >
> > Such considerations figured in conversations we have had with human
> rights
> > organizations that considered hiring drones in Syria, but opted in the
> end
> > for supplying protesters with phones, satellite modems and safe houses.
> For
> > nearly a year now, brave amateurs with their tiny cameras arguably have
> > been doing the trick in Syria. In those circumstances, the value that a
> > drone could add might not be worth the investment and risks.
> >
> > Even if humanitarian drones are not used in Syria, they should assume
> their
> > place in the arsenal of human rights advocates. It is a precedent worth
> > setting, especially in situations where evidence of large-scale human
> > rights violations is hard to come by.
> >
> > Drones can reach places and see things cell phones cannot. Social media
> did
> > not document the worst of the genocide in the remote villages of Darfur
> in
> > 2003 and 2004. Camera-toting protesters could not enter the fields where
> > 8,000 men and boys were massacred in Srebrenica in 1995. Graphic and
> > detailed evidence of crimes against humanity does not guarantee a just
> > response, but it helps.
> >
> > If human rights organizations can spy on evil, they should.
> >
> > *Andrew Stobo Sniderman and Mark Hanis are co-founders of the Genocide
> > Intervention Network.*
> > _______________________________________________
> > liberationtech mailing list
> > liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu
> >
> > Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
> >
> > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
> >
> > If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click
> > above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily
> > digest?"
> >
> > You will need the user name and password you receive from the list
> > moderator in monthly reminders.
> >
> > Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
> >
> > Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
> >
> _______________________________________________
> liberationtech mailing list
> liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu
>
> Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
>
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
>
> If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click
> above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily
> digest?"
>
> You will need the user name and password you receive from the list
> moderator in monthly reminders.
>
> Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
>
> Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
>
_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu

Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:

https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech

If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?"

You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders.

Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.

Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech

----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE