[cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors? (Re: Auditable CAs)

[Eugen Leitl]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:10:36PM -0500, Ted Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 11:47 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> > I will cease forwarding this thread as it just increases 
> > the local noise. Anyone who's interested can subscribe to the list
> > directly.
> > 
> > Feel free to point me towards other relevant lists, I will subscribe
> > there and digest relevant threads to here.
> 
> What's your impression of the proportion of emails that aren't
> interesting to emails that are interesting but not worth forwarding to
> emails that are worth forwarding?

Cryptograhy@ is definitely worth subscribing to for a cypherpunk.
 
> I've been burned in the past by subscribing to lists that previously you
> had been a good filter for, so I'd like to make sure this time.

I'm glad you find it useful.
 
> It would be FANTASTIC to have records for forwarded emails/all emails
> for the lists you forward to other lists. That would be interesting.

I have a number of sorting buckets I dump stuff worth saving
for future reference http://postbiota.org/pipermail/

E.g. info has some cpunkly relevance, but not too much:
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/info/ 

tt is even more tenuous: http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/
(RSS feed: http://postbiota.org/pipermail/list.rss )

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE