[cryptography] really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors? (Re: Auditable CAs)

[Tom Ritter]

> What's your impression of the proportion of emails that aren't
> interesting to emails that are interesting but not worth forwarding to
> emails that are worth forwarding?
>
> I've been burned in the past by subscribing to lists that previously you
> had been a good filter for, so I'd like to make sure this time.

Interesting for me is probably around 65%.  You can judge for
yourself:  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.cryptography.randombit

I like it, but to be honest, it does get spouts of super-high volume
(like the last week while I was traveling).  I consume it via RSS from
gmane which keeps my inbox cleaner.

-tom