[cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Fri Dec 2 04:18:29 PST 2011

Previous message: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)
Next message: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

----- Forwarded message from Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz> -----

Previous message: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)
Next message: [cryptography] if MitM via sub-CA is going on, need a name-and-shame catalog (Re: really sub-CAs for MitM deep packet inspectors?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list