[liberationtech] Carrier IQ
Marnie Froberg
nellalouise at gmail.com
Thu Dec 1 10:01:51 PST 2011
Senator Al Franken as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Privacy Technology
and the Law has sent a letter to CarrierIQ asking a number of very specific
questions regarding user information and technical specifics. It will be
interesting to read their response, if there is one.
A copy of the letter is available here:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2011/12/01/heres-the-letter-senator-al-franken-just-sent-to-phone-rootkit-firm-carrier-iq/
The full text of the letter:
Dear Mr. Lenhart,
I am very concerned by recent reports that your companybs
softwarebpre-installed on smartphones used by millions of Americansbis
logging and may be transmitting extraordinarily sensitive information from
consumersb phones, including:
b" when they turn their phones on;
b" when they turn their phones off;
b" the phone numbers they dial;
b" the contents of text messages they receive;
b" the URLs of the websites they visit;
b" the contents of their online search queriesbeven when those
searches are encrypted; and
b" the location of the customer using the smartphonebeven when the
customer has expressly denied permission for an app that is currently
running to access his or her location.
It appears that this software runs automatically every time you turn your
phone on. It also appears that an average user would have no way to know
that this software is runningband that when that user finds out, he or she
will have no reasonable means to remove or stop it.
These revelations are especially concerning in light of Carrier IQbs public
assertions that it is bnot recording keystrokes or providing tracking
toolsb (November 16), b[d]oes not record your keystrokes,b and b[d]oes not
inspect or report on the content of your communications, such as the
content of emails and SMSsb (November 23).
I understand the need to provide usage and diagnostic information to
carriers. I also understand that carriers can modify Carrier IQbs
software. But it appears that Carrier IQbs software captures a broad swath
of extremely sensitive information from users that would appear to have
nothing to do with diagnosticsbincluding who they are calling, the contents
of the texts they are receiving, the contents of their searches, and the
websites they visit.
These actions may violate federal privacy laws, including the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. This is
potentially a very serious matter.
I ask that you provide answers to the following questions by December 14,
2011.
(1) Does Carrier IQ software log usersb location?
(2) What other data does Carrier IQ software log? Does it log:
a. The telephone numbers users dial?
b. The telephone numbers of individuals calling a user?
c. The contents of the text messages users receive?
d. The contents of the text messages users send?
e. The contents of the emails they receive?
f. The contents of the emails users send?
g. The URLs of the websites that users visit?
h. The contents of usersb online search queries?
i. The names or contact information from usersb address books?
j. Any other keystroke data?
(3) What if any of this data is transmitted off of a usersb phone?
When? In what form?
(4) Is that data transmitted to Carrier IQ? Is it transmitted to
smartphone manufacturers, operating system providers, or carriers? Is it
transmitted to any other third parties?
(5) If Carrier IQ receives this data, does it subsequently share it
with third parties? With whom does it share this data? What data is
shared?
(6) Will Carrier IQ allow users to stop any logging and transmission
of this data?
(7) How long does Carrier IQ store this data?
(8) Has Carrier IQ disclosed this data to federal or state law
enforcement?
(9) How does Carrier IQ protect this data against hackers and other
security threats?
(10) Does Carrier IQ believe that its actions comply with the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, including the federal wiretap
statute (18 U.S.C. B' 2511 et seq.), the pen register statute (18 USC B' 3121
et seq.), and the Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. B' 2701 et seq.)?
(11) Does Carrier IQ believe that its actions comply with the Computer
Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. B' 1030)? Why?
I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
AL FRANKEN
Chairman, Subcommittee on Privacy
Technology and the Law
_______________________________________________
liberationtech mailing list
liberationtech at lists.stanford.edu
Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to:
https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech
If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?"
You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders.
Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator.
Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the cypherpunks-legacy
mailing list