[silk] You're a liar! Draw!

Udhay Shankar N udhay at pobox.com
Fri Oct 8 05:56:27 PDT 2010


What an awesomely cool idea. Also, like many great hacks, an extremely
simple idea at its core.

Udhay

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/neuronarrative/201010/if-you-want-catch-liar-make-him-draw

If You Want to Catch a Liar, Make Him Draw
Liars stumble when they can't verbalize their lies
Published on October 4, 2010

A man accused of a crime is brought into a police interrogation room and
sits down at an empty table. There's no polygraph equipment in sight,
and the typical two-cop questioning team isn't in the room either.
Instead, one officer enters the room with a piece of paper and a pencil
in his hands. He sets them in front of the suspect, steps back, and
calmly says, "draw."

That's a greatly oversimplified description of what could happen in
actual interrogation rooms if the results of a study in the journal
Applied Cognitive Psychology were widely adopted. The study is the first
to investigate whether drawing is an effective lie detection technique
in comparison to verbal methods.
Related Links

Researchers hypothesized that several tendencies would become evident in
the scribbles and sketches of liars not found in those of non-liars. For
instance, they suspected that liars, when asked to sketch out the
particulars of a location where they hadn't really been to meet someone
they hadn't really met, would provide less detail in their drawings.
They also suspected that the drawing would seem less plausible overall,
and would not include a depiction of the person they allegedly met.

They also hypothesized that non-liars would use a "shoulder-camera"
perspective to draw the situation--a direct, line-of-sight view that
previous research suggests is more indicative of truth telling. Liars,
they suspected, would use an "overhead-camera" perspective, indicating a
sense of detachment from the situation.

Subjects were given a "mission" that included going to a designated
location and meeting a person with whom they would exchange information.
In all, four different missions were conducted. The particulars of the
missions were constructed such that about half of the participants
would, when interviewed, be able to tell the truth about what happened,
and half would have to lie (the researchers used a fabricated espionage
theme to work this out--very clever).

During the interview, subjects were asked questions about their
experience, as would happen in a normal interrogation, and also asked to
draw the particulars of their experience. Results of the verbal
responses could then be compared to the drawn responses to determine
which method was more effective in identifying liars.

Here's what happened: No significant differences in level of detail were
found between verbal and drawn statements, but the plausibility of
truthful drawings was somewhat higher than deceptive drawings. A similar
difference in plausibility was not evident between truthful and
deceptive verbal statements.

More interestingly, significantly more truth tellers included the
"agent" (other person in the situation) in their drawings than did liars
(80% vs. 13%). In addition, significantly more truth tellers drew from a
shoulder-camera view than liars, who by and large drew from an overhead
view (53% vs. 19%). In verbal statements, more truth tellers also
mentioned the agent than liars (53% vs. 19%).

Using the "sketching the agent" result alone, it was possible to
identify 80% of the truth tellers and 87% of the liars--results superior
to most traditional interview techniques.

The main reason drawing seems to be effective in identifying liars is
that they have less time to work out the details. Someone who is telling
the truth already has a visual image of where they were and what
happened (even if it's not perfect, which of course it never is), but
liars have to manufacture the details. It's easier to concoct something
verbally than to first visualize and then create it on paper.



Copyright 2010 - David DiSalvo

-- 
((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))

----- End forwarded message -----
-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE





More information about the cypherpunks-legacy mailing list